NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 7 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kylie E. Hunter; Mason Aberoumand; Sol Libesman; James X. Sotiropoulos; Jonathan G. Williams; Jannik Aagerup; Rui Wang; Ben W. Mol; Wentao Li; Angie Barba; Nipun Shrestha; Angela C. Webster; Anna Lene Seidler – Research Synthesis Methods, 2024
Increasing concerns about the trustworthiness of research have prompted calls to scrutinise studies' Individual Participant Data (IPD), but guidance on how to do this was lacking. To address this, we developed the IPD Integrity Tool to screen randomised controlled trials (RCTs) for integrity issues. Development of the tool involved a literature…
Descriptors: Integrity, Randomized Controlled Trials, Participant Characteristics, Computer Software
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Mona Farouk Ali – Research Evaluation, 2025
Research evaluation (RE) has experienced a major global transformation prompted by the emergence and increasing usage of digital citation platforms such as the Web of Science and Scopus, opening up avenues for scientometric evaluation (SE). This relatively novel evaluation method represents an essential pillar for the scientific committees for…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Decision Making, Faculty Promotion, Committees
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Lock, Leonard K.; Kraska, Marie – Studies in Higher Education, 2015
The study was based upon surveying colleges/schools of education with graduate programs from the "US News and World Report" "Best Education Schools 2011" (N = 89). Results indicated that greatest time was spent on data collection, data management, and compilation; while least time was focused on instrument technical…
Descriptors: Work Experience, College Faculty, Management Systems, Graduate Study
McNiel, Nancy O. – Business Officer, 1994
The approach used by the University of Texas at Houston to fill a key administrative position is described. The method used a team of 13 members representing each school involved and other key constituents. Factors affecting the team's cohesiveness, procedures, and follow-up activities are explained. (MSE)
Descriptors: Administrator Selection, College Administration, Cooperation, Decision Making
Scriven, Michael; And Others – 1971
This report submitted by Advocate Team No. 2 to the U.S. Office of Education, Division of Research and Development Resources (formerly Division of Manpower and Institutions) presents a proposed evaluation system for regional labs and R&D centers consisting of a two-tiered panel organization. The tiers are: (1) A Master Panel--a blue-ribbon…
Descriptors: Advisory Committees, Decision Making, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods
St. John, Mark – 1984
The guide describes how committee hearings can be used in an educational as well as a political context. A committee hearing approach can be used in education (1) when a committee suited to carry out the evaluation task already exists; (2) when a written report is likely to be ignored or to have minimal effect; (3) when the decision-maker or…
Descriptors: Committees, Course Evaluation, Curriculum Evaluation, Decision Making
Guion, Robert; And Others – 1977
Department chairpersons, college deans, and members of college-level personnel committees at Bowling Green State University (BGSU) were interviewed concerning their use of procedures by which college students measure or evaluate teaching, teachers, and classes. All regular teaching faculty at BGSU and associated administrators also were asked to…
Descriptors: Administrators, Committees, Course Evaluation, Decision Making