Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Decision Making | 2 |
| Evaluators | 2 |
| Program Evaluation | 2 |
| Program Implementation | 2 |
| Administration | 1 |
| Administrators | 1 |
| Community Needs | 1 |
| Educational Change | 1 |
| Educational Policy | 1 |
| Educational Trends | 1 |
| Ethics | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
| Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
| Australia | 1 |
| California | 1 |
| Canada | 1 |
| Denmark | 1 |
| France | 1 |
| Germany | 1 |
| Israel | 1 |
| Mexico | 1 |
| New Zealand | 1 |
| Norway | 1 |
| South Korea | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Direct linkGolden, Gillian – OECD Publishing, 2020
This paper aims to survey the current landscape of education policy evaluation across OECD countries and economies by examining recent trends and contextual factors that can promote more robust education policy evaluation, as well as identifying key challenges. It takes a view of policy evaluation as an activity that takes place throughout the…
Descriptors: Educational Policy, Program Evaluation, Educational Trends, Educational Change
Peer reviewedEddy, Rebecca M.; Berry, Tiffany – American Journal of Evaluation, 2009
Evaluators face challenges when programs consistently fail to meet expectations for performance or improvement and consequently, evaluators may recommend that closing a program is the most prudent course of action. However, the evaluation literature provides little guidance regarding when an evaluator might recommend program closure. Given…
Descriptors: Community Needs, Evaluators, Lobbying, Heuristics
