Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Decision Making | 2 |
| Test Validity | 2 |
| Value Judgment | 2 |
| Career Choice | 1 |
| Career Planning | 1 |
| College Students | 1 |
| Course Selection (Students) | 1 |
| Foreign Countries | 1 |
| Grade 11 | 1 |
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Mathematics Anxiety | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Krieshok, Thomas S. | 1 |
| Li, Ning | 1 |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
| Grade 11 | 1 |
| High Schools | 1 |
| Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Australia | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Download full textLi, Ning – Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, 2019
The instrument of mathematics enrolment choice motivation (MECM) is designed to measure factors that influence students' decisions to keep or drop mathematics in Year 11. Using survey responses from 289 Year 11 students, this paper presents the initial form of the instrument, examines its factor structure, internal consistency and discriminant…
Descriptors: Mathematics Instruction, Decision Making, Grade 11, Secondary School Students
Peer reviewedKrieshok, Thomas S.; And Others – Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1986
Compared the reliability and validity of three methods of measuring students' ability to articulate their career values. Cochran's method and idiosyncratic and standardized methods developed in response to problems with the Cochran method. Test-retest reliabilities for the three methods were .33, .66, and .19, respectively. The findings suggest…
Descriptors: Career Choice, Career Planning, College Students, Decision Making
