Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Classification | 2 |
| Definitions | 2 |
| Generalization | 2 |
| Communication Skills | 1 |
| Design | 1 |
| Educational Benefits | 1 |
| Evaluation Criteria | 1 |
| Feedback (Response) | 1 |
| Labeling (of Persons) | 1 |
| Learning Processes | 1 |
| Maintenance | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Download full textTopping, Keith – Education Sciences, 2021
The present paper offers a definition of peer assessment and then reviews the major syntheses on its effectiveness. However, the main part of this paper is preoccupied with how to do PA successfully. A typology of 44 elements explains the differences between the many types of peer assessment. Then a theoretical model outlines some of the processes…
Descriptors: Peer Evaluation, Definitions, Program Effectiveness, Models
Peer reviewedLowitzer, Arthur C.; And Others – Mental Retardation, 1987
A survey of state mental retardation/developmental disabilities agencies found that while most employ a classification system that is compatible with or derived from that of the American Association on Mental Deficiency (AAMD), only 22 are actually using the 1983 edition of the AAMD alone or with another system. (Author/VW)
Descriptors: Classification, Definitions, Generalization, Labeling (of Persons)
