Descriptor
| Demonstration Programs | 4 |
| Evaluation Criteria | 4 |
| Evaluation Methods | 4 |
| Validated Programs | 4 |
| Elementary Secondary Education | 2 |
| Information Dissemination | 2 |
| Program Effectiveness | 2 |
| Program Evaluation | 2 |
| Program Validation | 2 |
| Career Education | 1 |
| Career Ladders | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Covert, Robert W. | 1 |
| Dereshiwsky, Mary I. | 1 |
| Fang, Wei Li | 1 |
| Hamilton, Jack A. | 1 |
| Mitchell, Anita M. | 1 |
| Niemiec, Richard P. | 1 |
| Packard, Richard D. | 1 |
| Walberg, Herbert J. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Reports - Evaluative | 3 |
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 2 |
| Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
| Policymakers | 1 |
Location
| Arizona | 1 |
| United States | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Download full textCovert, Robert W.; Fang, Wei Li – 1981
The Joint Dissemination Review Panel (JDRP) examines educational interventions and determines their effectiveness. This study's purpose was to assess this review process and identify common characteristics of submittals and ways in which approvals and rejections differed. A locally-developed instrument which collected data on the intervention's…
Descriptors: Demonstration Programs, Educational Practices, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewedHamilton, Jack A.; Mitchell, Anita M. – Journal of Career Education, 1979
Presents criteria used to identify the nation's best evaluated exemplary career education activities and provides a list of the seven programs reviewed by the Joint Dissemination Review Panel and judged to be exemplary. (MF)
Descriptors: Career Education, Demonstration Programs, Educational Assessment, Educational Programs
Peer reviewedWalberg, Herbert J.; Niemiec, Richard P. – Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1993
Several validation methods for the identification and dissemination of exemplary educational programs are explored, and the rationales for methods developed by the Program Effectiveness Panel are discussed. Comparative advantages and disadvantages of four selected methods are reviewed, and recommendations are made for policymakers and…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Curriculum Evaluation, Demonstration Programs, Elementary Secondary Education
Packard, Richard D.; Dereshiwsky, Mary I. – 1992
In 1985, Arizona initiated a 5-year pilot test of the Career Ladder Teacher Incentive and Development Program. The program provided alternate avenues for teachers to advance other than by accumulating years of experience and college credits. Data were collected annually through the Career Ladder Perception Assessment Scale Survey, which evaluated…
Descriptors: Career Ladders, Demonstration Programs, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Criteria
