Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Adults | 2 |
| Difficulty Level | 2 |
| Readability | 2 |
| Readability Formulas | 2 |
| Access to Information | 1 |
| Adult Literacy | 1 |
| Cognitive Processes | 1 |
| Content Analysis | 1 |
| Documentation | 1 |
| Health | 1 |
| Measurement Techniques | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Dissertations/Theses -… | 1 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Flesch Kincaid Grade Level… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Direct linkMorales, Miraida – ProQuest LLC, 2019
To investigate how readability affects the way adults who are learning to read evaluate health information, a mixed methods research study was designed based on a sociotechnical framework and using theories of everyday life information seeking. The study analyzed a corpus of consumer health information documents (N = 501) using the CohMetrix text…
Descriptors: Readability, Adults, Adult Literacy, Health
Peer reviewedDuffy, Thomas M.; Kabance, Paula – Journal of Educational Psychology, 1982
The present findings imply that a readability formula is not an effective writing production criterion, even when the writer does not deliberately write to the formula. Comprehensibility of text might be better controlled through the proper use of the transformer concept (MacDonald-Ross and Waller). (Author/PN)
Descriptors: Adults, Cognitive Processes, Content Analysis, Difficulty Level
