Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
Difficulty Level | 2 |
Predictive Validity | 2 |
Readability Formulas | 2 |
Beginning Reading | 1 |
Cloze Procedure | 1 |
Correlation | 1 |
Error Patterns | 1 |
Evaluation Methods | 1 |
Grade 1 | 1 |
Measurement Techniques | 1 |
Predictive Measurement | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Cunningham, James W. | 1 |
Hiebert, Elfrieda H. | 1 |
Hoffman, James V. | 1 |
Mesmer, Heidi Anne | 1 |
Patterson, Elizabeth | 1 |
Pennington, Julie | 1 |
Roser, Nancy L. | 1 |
Salas, Rachel | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 2 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Flesch Kincaid Grade Level… | 1 |
Lexile Scale of Reading | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Cunningham, James W.; Hiebert, Elfrieda H.; Mesmer, Heidi Anne – Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 2018
In recent years, readability formulas have gained new prominence as a basis for selecting texts for learning and assessment. Variables that quantitative tools count (e.g., word frequency, sentence length) provide valid measures of text complexity insofar as they accurately predict representative and high-quality criteria. The longstanding…
Descriptors: Readability, Readability Formulas, Evaluation Methods, Correlation

Hoffman, James V.; Roser, Nancy L.; Salas, Rachel; Patterson, Elizabeth; Pennington, Julie – Journal of Literacy Research, 2001
Investigates reliability of two approaches for estimating text difficulty at the first-grade level: the Scale for Text Accessibility and Support and the Fountas/Pinnell system. Supports the predictive validity of the two rating scales with performance data. Suggests potential benchmarks for first-grade performance: 95% accuracy; 80 words per…
Descriptors: Beginning Reading, Difficulty Level, Grade 1, Measurement Techniques