Descriptor
Difficulty Level | 3 |
Readability | 3 |
Readability Formulas | 3 |
Reading Interests | 3 |
Abstract Reasoning | 1 |
College Freshmen | 1 |
Content Analysis | 1 |
Guidelines | 1 |
High School Seniors | 1 |
Instructional Materials | 1 |
Measurement Techniques | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Guides - Non-Classroom | 2 |
Journal Articles | 2 |
Numerical/Quantitative Data | 1 |
Opinion Papers | 1 |
Reports - Research | 1 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Johnston, Brenda A. – Performance and Instruction, 1985
Following a brief discussion of two facets of written material readability--reading ease and human interest--two reasons why written instructional material may be so difficult to read are considered: use of technical vocabulary and abstract language. Suggestions to make written instructional materials more readable are provided. (MBR)
Descriptors: Abstract Reasoning, Difficulty Level, Guidelines, Instructional Materials

Long, Richard R. – School Science Review, 1991
Some factors that should be considered when science teachers produce materials for their students are presented. Readability and the key aspects of language (vocabulary, sentence structure, textbook or examination style, and organization and presentation) are discussed. Directions and the graph needed for estimating the reading level of materials…
Descriptors: Content Analysis, Difficulty Level, Measurement Techniques, Readability
Klare, George R. – 1981
Two studies investigated the relationships between readability, prior knowledge, and interest in the material being read. In the first study, 169 college freshmen read cloze passages of materials from the Nelson-Denny Reading Tests, then one week later read the whole passages and completed the related multiple choice questions. A control group…
Descriptors: College Freshmen, Difficulty Level, High School Seniors, Prior Learning