Descriptor
| Disabilities | 16 |
| Expulsion | 16 |
| Legal Problems | 16 |
| Elementary Secondary Education | 14 |
| Suspension | 12 |
| Court Litigation | 11 |
| Federal Legislation | 10 |
| Student Rights | 10 |
| Due Process | 9 |
| Discipline | 8 |
| Compliance (Legal) | 6 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| NASSP Bulletin | 2 |
| Education Unlimited | 1 |
| Exceptional Children | 1 |
| Executive Educator | 1 |
| Journal of College and… | 1 |
| Journal of Special Education | 1 |
| Principal | 1 |
| West's Education Law Reporter | 1 |
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 2 |
| Administrators | 1 |
| Policymakers | 1 |
Location
| Alabama | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| Education for All Handicapped… | 4 |
| Individuals with Disabilities… | 4 |
| Rehabilitation Act 1973… | 4 |
| Americans with Disabilities… | 2 |
| Family Educational Rights and… | 1 |
| Fourteenth Amendment | 1 |
| Individuals with Disabilities… | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedGolden, Diane Cordry – NASSP Bulletin, 1993
Reviews current legal interpretations regarding discipline of handicapped students. Proposes a model for fostering compliance with legal mandates when considering disciplinary procedures for such students. Principals should employ behavior management options (such as time-out techniques, use of school counseling and social workers, in-school…
Descriptors: Administrator Responsibility, Behavior Problems, Disabilities, Discipline
Peer reviewedOsborne, Allan G., Jr. – West's Education Law Reporter, 1988
Although a 1975 Supreme Court ruling upheld students' suspension or expulsion from school, these punishments may not apply to handicapped students, who are guaranteed a free, appropriate education under the Education for All Handicapped Children Act. Article discusses implications of "Honig v. Doe" (1988), a Supreme Court decision…
Descriptors: Disabilities, Discipline, Due Process, Elementary Secondary Education
Frasco, Lisa J. – Education Unlimited, 1980
The author reviews cases involving suspension and expulsion from school of handicapped students. The role of procedural safeguards is considered. Differences between approaches of the office of Civil Rights and the Bureau of Education for the Handicapped are examined. (CL)
Descriptors: Compliance (Legal), Court Litigation, Disabilities, Due Process
Zirkel, Perry A.; Gluckman, Ivan B. – Principal, 1997
In an era promulgating "zero tolerance" of school violence, courts are giving considerable latitude to school officials in administering student discipline. The vast majority of student due process claims arising from suspensions and expulsions, including a recent marijuana possession case in Alabama, have failed in recent years. The…
Descriptors: Court Litigation, Disabilities, Discipline, Due Process
Zirkel, Perry A. – Executive Educator, 1996
Some superintendents'"zero-tolerance" stance on guns, drugs, and disruptive student behavior conflicts with federal laws (Individuals with Disabilities Act and Americans with Disabilities Act), which apply a "zero-reject" policy to many categories of students with disabilities. Superintendents should revamp policies and…
Descriptors: Administrator Attitudes, Court Litigation, Disabilities, Elementary Secondary Education
Peer reviewedKing, Ashley Thomas – NASSP Bulletin, 1996
A survey of exclusionary discipline practices with handicapped students revealed a national pattern of "de facto" differential treatment. In denying a school's unilateral authority to remove dangerous or disruptive students, the Supreme Court's judgment in "Honig v. Doe" (1988) took precedence over all earlier court decisions.…
Descriptors: Behavior Problems, Court Litigation, Disabilities, Due Process
Hartwig, Eric P.; Ruesch, Gary M. – 1994
Despite the significant amount of attention given to student description, a serious controversy remains regarding the procedures that constitute effective discipline. This book is designed to meet the need for systematic investigation of the parameters of appropriate disciplinary practices for all students. It helps administrators formulate,…
Descriptors: Court Litigation, Disabilities, Discipline Policy, Due Process
Peer reviewedHartwig, Eric P.; Ruesch, Gary M. – Journal of Special Education, 2000
This article addresses the substantial changes that Congress made in the 1997 amendments to the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act concerning discipline of students with disabilities. It analyzes both the procedural and substantive requirements related to suspending students, expelling students, and conducting functional behavioral…
Descriptors: Compliance (Legal), Disabilities, Discipline, Due Process
Peer reviewedBartlett, Larry – Exceptional Children, 1989
Court decisions interpreting effects of Public Law 94-142 on traditional forms of public school discipline are reviewed, concluding that most forms of minor disciplinary remedies remain available to educators so long as they are also used with nonhandicapped students. However, legal problems arise with expulsion and long-term suspensions of…
Descriptors: Court Litigation, Disabilities, Discipline, Discipline Policy
Ordover, Eileen L. – 1996
This paper presents an outline and analysis of federal legislation and court decisions relevant to the exclusion of students with disabilities by school systems through the filing of delinquency and other petitions based upon in-school behavior. In many cases the behavior is related to the disability and/or to the consequences of the school…
Descriptors: Behavior Problems, Child Advocacy, Compliance (Legal), Court Litigation
Osborne, Allen G., Jr. – 1994
One of the more controversial issues that has come before the courts since the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Act (IDEA) concerns the imposition of disciplinary sanctions on students with disabilities. Because this issue is not directly addressed by the act, school administrators must turn to case law for guidance. This paper…
Descriptors: Behavior Disorders, Compliance (Legal), Court Litigation, Disabilities
Peer reviewedDiScala, Jeannette; And Others – Journal of College and University Law, 1992
The impact of a college administrator's decision that imposes conditions on enrollment of an emotionally or mentally impaired student is examined in the context of constitutional and federal law, including Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. The school's responsibility in such cases is discussed including providing the student with…
Descriptors: Civil Liberties, College Administration, College Students, Constitutional Law
Kreunen, Warren L. – 1981
Chapter 3 in a book on school law discusses a few of the many issues in the area of education for the handicapped which are being litigated in courts and agencies throughout the United States. Specifically, the chapter covers litigation regarding the application of the Education for All Handicapped Children Act, referred to as Public Law 94-142,…
Descriptors: Ancillary School Services, Compliance (Legal), Court Litigation, Disabilities
Thomason, Jo – 1994
This discussion addresses the legal issues in special education currently of critical concern to school administrators. It reviews outcomes of recent court cases, Department of Education policies, and legislative requirements concerning the following issues: (1) inclusion (a two-pronged test of compliance with mainstreaming requirements of the…
Descriptors: Behavior Disorders, Compliance (Legal), Court Litigation, Disabilities
Thomas, Stephen B. – 1985
Handicapped students are now protected by specific statutes in addition to the broad constitutional protection offered all students. As the number of related statutes, regulations, and case law decisions grew, assimilation became increasingly difficult. This publication attempts to meet educators' need for a succinct guide in special education…
Descriptors: Athletics, Board of Education Policy, Court Litigation, Disabilities
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1 | 2

