NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 4 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Cleveland, Harlan – Journal of College and University Law, 1985
The costs and benefits of openness for governance of higher education are analyzed through a survey of state sunshine laws, relevant case law, state attorney generals' opinions, and interviews with a cross-section of individuals representing the range of openness. (MSE)
Descriptors: College Administration, Confidentiality, Court Litigation, Disclosure
Cleveland, Harlan – Association of Governing Boards of Universities and Colleges, 1985
The impact of sunshine laws on college governance is discussed based on field and legal research, a Wingspread symposium (Racine, Wisconsin, September 4-5, 1984), and a follow-up meeting (Washington, D.C., October 1, 1984). In addition to open meeting laws, the way that the democratic process currently operates, and should work, is examined. A…
Descriptors: College Administration, Court Litigation, Definitions, Disclosure
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Cleveland, Harlan – Academe, 1987
Serving the public interest is the basis for most state open meeting laws (sunshine laws). To education administrators, the public interest lies in allowing public officials freedom to make decisions according to procedures they determine best meet the needs of their institutions. The conflict among viewpoints is discussed. (MLW)
Descriptors: Confidentiality, Court Litigation, Disclosure, Freedom of Information
Cleveland, Harlan – AGB Reports, 1985
The advantages and disadvantages of laws mandating openness in decision-making are outlined, and their particular relevance in the case of collegial decision-making is discussed. (MSE)
Descriptors: Communication (Thought Transfer), Decision Making, Democratic Values, Disclosure