NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 6 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Jurick, Donna M. – Communication Quarterly, 1977
Uses conversational analysis to investigate how people accomplish a specific enactment of their everyday lives. (MH)
Descriptors: Behavioral Science Research, Discourse Analysis, Higher Education, Interaction Process Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Litton-Hawes, Elaine M. – Communication Quarterly, 1977
Constructs a foundation for the study of everyday talk from a communication perspective. (MH)
Descriptors: Conceptual Schemes, Discourse Analysis, Higher Education, Interaction Process Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Nofsinger, Robert E., Jr. – Communication Quarterly, 1977
Focuses on an analysis of discourse in natural settings including speeches and formal presentations as well as informal meetings and ordinary talk. (MH)
Descriptors: Discourse Analysis, Higher Education, Information Theory, Interaction Process Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Glaser, Susan R.; Frank, David A. – Communication Quarterly, 1982
Demonstrates how rhetorical criticism can be utilized to clarify the rhetorical nature of interpersonal discourse. Synthesizes the following theories to explain the nature and form of selected portions of taped and transcribed interpersonal dialog: Lloyd Bitzer's situational theory, Ernest Bormann's fantasy theme analysis, and Carroll Arnold's…
Descriptors: Communication Research, Discourse Analysis, Interaction Process Analysis, Interpersonal Communication
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Goodall, H. Lloyd, Jr.; Phillips, Gerald M. – Communication Quarterly, 1981
Argues that studies on how and why humans talk, however precise the methodology, do not have the quality of science. Contends that these studies contain the essence of criticism and should be regarded as such. (PD)
Descriptors: Behavioral Sciences, Communication Research, Discourse Analysis, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Lustig, Myron W. – Communication Quarterly, 1980
Presents a computer analysis of talk-silence patterns of mixed sex triads related to levels of communication apprehension. Results indicate that high apprehensives talk less, talk less often, and are interrupted less often than low apprehensives. Discusses the implications of computer use in talk-silence behavior research. (JMF)
Descriptors: Behavior Patterns, College Students, Communication Apprehension, Communication Research