Descriptor
| Disqualification | 6 |
| Two Year Colleges | 6 |
| Academic Probation | 4 |
| Grade Point Average | 3 |
| Academic Achievement | 1 |
| Academic Standards | 1 |
| Discipline Policy | 1 |
| Dropouts | 1 |
| Faculty Evaluation | 1 |
| Grading | 1 |
| Intellectual Development | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
Location
| California | 4 |
| Missouri | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Download full textNational Faculty Association of Community and Junior Colleges, Washington, DC. – 1970
These procedures--developed by a special commission of the National Faculty Association of Community and Junior Colleges--describe the frequency, nature, process, and scope of such actions. The criteria and methods of evaluation are set at an initial conference between the evaluation team and the faculty member, and the college is obligated to…
Descriptors: Discipline Policy, Disqualification, Faculty Evaluation, Two Year Colleges
Fugle, James B., Jr. – 1968
This description of the probation-retention-disqualification policy at Santa Monica City College (Calif.) may provide guidelines for other institutions. A student may be placed on probation if he (1) has a GPA below 2.0 in all college units attempted, (2) is a transfer while on probation from or disqualified by another school, or (3) is readmitted…
Descriptors: Academic Probation, Disqualification, Grade Point Average, Two Year Colleges
Brooks, Walter L. – 1968
In July 1967, the California State Board of Education set minimum probation standards for junior colleges, providing that (1) students having less than a 2.0 GPA (with 12 or more units attempted) will be put on academic probation, (2) all such students will receive special counseling, and (3) those failing to maintain a 1.75 GPA for three…
Descriptors: Academic Probation, Disqualification, Grade Point Average, Two Year Colleges
COLLINS, CHARLES C. – 1965
THIS PAPER PRESENTS A CASE FOR MAKING JUNIOR COLLEGE GRADING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES COMPATIBLE WITH THE STATED PURPOSES OF THE JUNIOR COLLEGE. IT LISTS SOME HISTORIC AND PERSONAL PHILOSOPHIC ASSUMPTIONS REGARDING PURPOSES. THE INCOMPATIBILITY OF THE GRADING PRACTICES WITH THESE PURPOSES IS REVIEWED THROUGH SOME STUDIES MADE AT GROSSMONT COLLEGE,…
Descriptors: Academic Probation, Academic Standards, Disqualification, Grade Point Average
Wood, Samuel E. – 1968
To determine if certain non-intellectual factors affected educational persistence, three null-hypotheses were tested for both sexes, namely, that there i s no significant difference between (1) those who persist (P) and those who withdraw (W), (2) those who persist (P) and those who are dismissed (D), and (3) those who withdraw(W) and those who…
Descriptors: Disqualification, Dropouts, Intellectual Development, Persistence
MERSON, THOMAS B. – 1966
STATEMENTS OF THE PROBATION AND DISMISSAL POLICIES FOR EACH OF 21 CALIFORNIA JUNIOR COLLEGES ARE ACCOMPANIED BY STATISTICAL DATA SHOWING THE NUMBERS OF STUDENTS AFFECTED BY THE POLICIES, AND--IN SOME CASES--THE EFFECTS OF RAISING THE STATE MINIMUM GRADE POINT AVERAGE FOR GOOD STANDING FROM ITS CURRENT 1.5 TO 2.0. CONCLUDING THAT…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Academic Probation, Disqualification, Policy
