Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Distinctive Features… | 6 |
| Sign Language | 6 |
| Phonology | 4 |
| Comparative Analysis | 3 |
| American Sign Language | 2 |
| Foreign Countries | 2 |
| Language Universals | 2 |
| Sociolinguistics | 2 |
| Communication (Thought… | 1 |
| Correlation | 1 |
| Creoles | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Woodward, James | 2 |
| De Santis, Susan | 1 |
| Jepson, Jill | 1 |
| Johnson, Robert E. | 1 |
| Kozak, Viola | 1 |
| Liddell, Scott K. | 1 |
| Macleod, Catriona | 1 |
| Tomita, Nozomi | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 4 |
| Reports - Research | 3 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
| India | 1 |
| Netherlands | 1 |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Tomita, Nozomi; Kozak, Viola – Sign Language Studies, 2012
This paper focuses on two selected phonological patterns that appear unique to Saudi Arabian Sign Language (SASL). For both sections of this paper, the overall methodology is the same as that discussed in Stephen and Mathur (this volume), with some additional modifications tailored to the specific studies discussed here, which will be expanded…
Descriptors: Sign Language, Phonology, Distinctive Features (Language), Comparative Analysis
Johnson, Robert E.; Liddell, Scott K. – Sign Language Studies, 2011
In this article we describe a componential, articulatory approach to the phonetic description of the configuration of the four fingers. Abandoning the traditional holistic, perceptual approach, we propose a system of notational devices and distinctive features for the description of the four fingers proper (index, middle, ring, and pinky).…
Descriptors: Phonetics, Phonetic Transcription, Human Body, Correlation
Peer reviewedJepson, Jill – Language in Society, 1991
Comparison of Indian rural and urban sign languages of the deaf found that the urban form transmitted information primarily by means of appeal to a shared linguistic code, and the rural form mainly by appeal to communal nonlinguistic knowledge. Both languages employed effective and appropriate means given their environments. (23 references)…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Deafness, Distinctive Features (Language), Foreign Countries
Peer reviewedMacleod, Catriona – Linguistics, 1973
Descriptors: Communication (Thought Transfer), Deaf Interpreting, Distinctive Features (Language), Language Universals
Peer reviewedWoodward, James – Sign Language Studies, 1987
Describes single finger sign contact in data from ten different sign languages. The relative frequencies of signs using each of the four possible fingers are examined. Proposes distinctive features to explain the differences in frequency and use of these handshapes in sign languages in general. (Author/LMO)
Descriptors: American Sign Language, Comparative Analysis, Distinctive Features (Language), English
Woodward, James; De Santis, Susan – 1976
This paper examines negative incorporation in various lects of two historically related sign languages, French Sign Language and American Sign Language. Negative incorporation not only offers interesting insights into the structure of French and American Sign Language, but also into the descriptive and explanatory power of variation theory. By…
Descriptors: Creoles, Diachronic Linguistics, Distinctive Features (Language), Females

Direct link
