Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Adolescents | 2 |
| Drug Education | 2 |
| Drug Use | 2 |
| Intervention | 2 |
| Behavior Change | 1 |
| Behavior Modification | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Drinking | 1 |
| Dropout Prevention | 1 |
| Dropouts | 1 |
| Emotional Adjustment | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Journal of Drug Education | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Education | 1 |
| Grade 6 | 1 |
| Intermediate Grades | 1 |
| Junior High Schools | 1 |
| Middle Schools | 1 |
| Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Florida | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Does not meet standards | 2 |
Peer reviewed
Direct linkHall, Bruce W.; Bacon, Tina P.; Ferron, John M. – Journal of Drug Education, 2013
Sixth graders participating in the "Too Good for Drugs" (TGFD) prevention program in comparison to 6th graders not participating show different results by student risk level. Sixth graders from 20 middle schools were randomly assigned to receive the intervention and those from 20 paired middle schools assigned to serve as controls (N =…
Descriptors: Drug Education, Prevention, Adolescents, Program Effectiveness
Download full textEggert, Leona L.; And Others – 1992
Investigating the possibility of designing effective intervention programs for at-risk students, this study used simultaneous methods in a classroom setting for working with drug use problems, poor attendance, and emotional distress. The study was a two-group, repeated measures, clinical trial which was presented to high risk students as a…
Descriptors: Adolescents, Behavior Change, Behavior Modification, Dropout Prevention
