Descriptor
Discipline Policy | 46 |
Due Process | 46 |
Student Behavior | 46 |
Student Rights | 31 |
Elementary Secondary Education | 23 |
Court Litigation | 22 |
School Law | 15 |
Suspension | 14 |
Student School Relationship | 13 |
Discipline | 12 |
School Policy | 12 |
More ▼ |
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
Practitioners | 10 |
Administrators | 6 |
Policymakers | 3 |
Parents | 2 |
Students | 2 |
Location
South Carolina | 2 |
Kentucky | 1 |
New Jersey | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Goss v Lopez | 2 |
Education of the Handicapped… | 1 |
Individuals with Disabilities… | 1 |
Ingraham v Wright | 1 |
New Jersey v TLO | 1 |
Rehabilitation Act 1973 | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating

Zirkel, Perry A.; Gluckman, Ivan B. – NASSP Bulletin, 1987
Presents two legal cases involving high school students ("Birdsey v. Grand Blanc Community Schools" and "State v. Wolfer") that illustrate requirements for use of "Miranda Warnings." These warnings are not usually required to be provided in civil suits, or proceedings involved in administration of school discipline.…
Descriptors: Court Litigation, Discipline, Discipline Policy, Due Process

Flygare, Thomas J. – Journal of Law and Education, 1974
Examines the procedural due process challenge to short-term suspensions. (Author)
Descriptors: Discipline Policy, Due Process, Elementary Secondary Education, Equal Protection
Hechinger, Fred M. – Saturday Review (New York 1975), 1975
A revolutionary concept - a bill of rights for school children - is being heatedly debated within the teaching Establishment. (Editor)
Descriptors: Discipline Policy, Due Process, Equal Education, School Administration
Michigan State Univ., East Lansing. – 1967
Approved by the Academic Council, the Academic Senate, and the Board of Trustees of Michigan State University, this document was prepared by the Faculty Committee on Student Affairs after an extensive review and study of the University's rules and structures relating to academic freedom for students. In an attempt to formulate an operational…
Descriptors: Academic Freedom, Discipline Policy, Due Process, Higher Education
Grosenick, Judith; And Others – 1982
Issues surrounding disciplinary exclusion of seriously emotionally disturbed children from public schools are addressed, along with applicable federal legislation, court cases, and Office of Civil Rights (OCR) opinions. Exclusion is defined as the removal from, or the prohibition of, participating in the public school program in part or entirety,…
Descriptors: Behavior Disorders, Compliance (Legal), Court Litigation, Disabilities
Harris, J. John, III; And Others – 1981
A brief history of corporal punishment in the public schools, a review of major federal court decisions regarding corporal punishment and due process for students, and an analysis of current trends in disciplinary policy are presented in this report. The conservative trend revealed in school discipline is identified in large part as a response to…
Descriptors: Corporal Punishment, Court Litigation, Discipline Policy, Discipline Problems

Phay, Robert E.; Winn, Edward L. – School Law Bulletin, 1976
Courts seldom overturn school board punishment of students for drug abuse; in fact, relatively few cases even reach the courts. Problems usually arise from poorly written statutes and board regulations that are either vague or inconsistent with statutory requirements. (JG)
Descriptors: Court Litigation, Discipline Policy, Drug Abuse, Due Process
Ostroth, D. David; And Others – Journal of College Student Personnel, 1978
Recent developments in student judicial (disciplinary) systems were surveyed at large institutions of higher education. The past five years have seen more standardization of procedural due process and some growth in judicial structures. The dean of students office, instead of student judicial committee(s), still conducts the majority of…
Descriptors: Codes of Ethics, Discipline Policy, Due Process, Higher Education
Liggett, Lee B. – 1982
The doctrine of in loco parentis (that school authorities stand in the place of a parent while a child is attending school) was always used to measure the rights of authorities relative to student conduct. In 1969, however, the Supreme Court rang the death knell for unrestricted control by school officials over students in its decision on "Tinker…
Descriptors: Attendance, Court Litigation, Discipline Policy, Due Process

Mallios, Harry C. – High School Journal, 1973
The central theme of this discussion deals with the legal aspect and increasing prominence of due process of law as it relates to the rights of students in public schools. (Author)
Descriptors: Court Litigation, Discipline Policy, Due Process, Educational Trends
Nation's Schools, 1972
Discusses an NEA task force study of the use of corporal punishment in schools. Study results indicate that physical punishment as a disciplinary measure causes great harm, such as student behavioral problems and potential lasting psychological damage. Sixteen reasons for abandoning corporal punishment are presented along with task force…
Descriptors: Classroom Techniques, Corporal Punishment, Discipline, Discipline Policy
Canadian Teachers' Federation, Ottawa (Ontario). – 1975
This bibliography lists recent books, articles, masters' theses, and doctoral dissertations dealing with the subject of school discipline. Entries are limited to materials that have appeared since an earlier bibliography on this topic was published in March 1972. Sources consulted in preparing the bibliography include the Bibliographie du Quebec,…
Descriptors: Bibliographies, Corporal Punishment, Discipline, Discipline Policy

Chamelin, Neil; Trunzo, Kae B. – Journal of Research and Development in Education, 1978
Examines the reasons for the rapid intervention of courts into areas primarily an administrative decision-making process and describes those areas in which legal decisions have drastically defined and restricted the permissible scope of administrative activity in schools. (Author/RK)
Descriptors: Administrative Policy, Court Litigation, Discipline Policy, Dress Codes
Hollister, C. A. – American School Board Journal, 1973
Asserts that courts are today handing down decisions in matters they would previously have avoided. Warns that board sovereignty and rights of local control will be protected by the courts, but only if the boards act fairly and reasonably. The author presents five court cases and invites readers to determine whether their decisions would have been…
Descriptors: Board of Education Policy, Corporal Punishment, Court Litigation, Discipline Policy
Sorensen, Gail – Legal Memorandum, 1995
Practical guidelines are presented for implementing a discipline policy at the local level for students with disabilities, with suggestions for distinguishing policies affecting students in general and students with disabilities. Emphasis is placed on emerging issues and practical consequences. Relevant federal and state court decisions are cited,…
Descriptors: Behavior Problems, Compliance (Legal), Court Litigation, Disabilities