NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Back to results
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
ERIC Number: EJ363393
Record Type: Journal
Publication Date: 1987
Pages: N/A
Abstractor: N/A
ISBN: N/A
ISSN: N/A
EISSN: N/A
Available Date: N/A
Type and Rigor of Staff Evaluation Procedures and Problematic, Versus Non-Problematic Outcomes: Some Implications for Planners.
Terry, Patrick A.; Crawford, George J.
Educational Planning, v6 n2 p18-29 Sum 1987
Describes methods to assess teacher evaluation procedures relative to their type and rigor. Districts using contemporary, more rigorous evaluation systems experience fewer due process hearings than districts with traditional evaluation systems. Draws practical implications concerning district vulnerabilities and presents brief overviews of due process rights for Kansas teachers. Includes 11 references. (MLH)
Publication Type: Journal Articles; Reports - Descriptive; Legal/Legislative/Regulatory Materials
Education Level: N/A
Audience: Practitioners; Policymakers
Language: English
Sponsor: N/A
Authoring Institution: N/A
Identifiers - Location: Kansas
Grant or Contract Numbers: N/A
Author Affiliations: N/A