Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Editing | 2 |
| Peer Evaluation | 2 |
| Psychology | 2 |
| Revision (Written Composition) | 2 |
| Achievement Gains | 1 |
| Assignments | 1 |
| Attitude Measures | 1 |
| Barriers | 1 |
| Collaborative Writing | 1 |
| College Freshmen | 1 |
| Cooperative Learning | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Psychology Learning and… | 2 |
Author
| Brooks, Patricia J. | 1 |
| Che, Elizabeth | 1 |
| Ludemann, Pamela M. | 1 |
| McMakin, Deborah | 1 |
| Shane-Simpson, Christina | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Postsecondary Education | 2 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Writing Apprehension Test | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkLudemann, Pamela M.; McMakin, Deborah – Psychology Learning and Teaching, 2014
The perceived value of peer editing to students is unclear. To investigate, first-year students (N = 35) completed a writing attitudes scale and first writing assignment in September 2012. The expected writing requirements were explained and handouts provided, as well as subsequent instructor feedback and grades. A second writing assignment was…
Descriptors: College Freshmen, Student Attitudes, Peer Evaluation, Editing
Shane-Simpson, Christina; Che, Elizabeth; Brooks, Patricia J. – Psychology Learning and Teaching, 2016
To test the feasibility of Wikipedia editing in large undergraduate psychology classrooms, we engaged groups of students in a large introductory-level Human Development course (N = 110) in editing Wikipedia articles to improve psychology-related content. Students attended in-class workshops and received online support to develop skills. They…
Descriptors: Encyclopedias, Electronic Publishing, Collaborative Writing, Web Sites
