NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
International English…1
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 71 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Galina Shulgina; Jamie Costley; Irina Shcheglova; Han Zhang; Natalya Sedova – Smart Learning Environments, 2024
While peer-editing is considered an important part of developing students' academic writing, questions remain about how different types of peer-editing affect subsequent student performance. The present study looked at a group of university students (N = 149) engaged in peer editing of one another's essays in an online security studies course. The…
Descriptors: Peer Evaluation, Writing Evaluation, Editing, Feedback (Response)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Fiona Richards; Nigel Harwood – International Journal for Educational Integrity, 2024
This article presents a research-based stakeholder tool informed by a study of the various types of changes proofreaders may make when proofreading a student text. Whilst the tool can be used to advise higher education students, (non-)professional proofreaders/editors, English for Academic Purposes (EAP) lecturers, writing centre tutors, and…
Descriptors: Proofreading, Writing Evaluation, Revision (Written Composition), English for Academic Purposes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Richards, K. Andrew R.; Hemphill, Michael A.; Flory, Sara B. – Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 2022
While there are benefits to collaborative research, navigating group dynamics can also bring challenges, particularly for doctoral students and early career academics who are new to the research process. These dynamics extend beyond initial manuscript submission and include processes associated with interpreting reviewer comments, deciding upon…
Descriptors: Doctoral Students, Student Research, Group Dynamics, Publications
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Al-Inbari, Fatima Abdullah Yahya; Al-Wasy, Baleigh Qassim Mohammed – Education and Information Technologies, 2023
Automated Writing Evaluation (AWE) is one of the machine techniques used for assessing learners' writing. Recently, this technique has been widely implemented for improving learners' editing strategies. Several studies have been conducted to compare self-editing with peer editing. However, only a few studies have compared automated peer and…
Descriptors: English Language Learners, Automation, Writing Evaluation, Peer Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Jamie Costley; Han Zhang; Matthew Courtney; Galina Shulgina; Matthew Baldwin; Mik Fanguy – Computer Assisted Language Learning, 2025
While the use of collaborative peer editing is widespread in some online learning contexts, little is known about how constituent editing behaviours impact student writing quality when using shared online documents as the mediating tool. Therefore, the present study (n = 176) examines the effects of English language learners' peer editing…
Descriptors: Editing, Peer Evaluation, English (Second Language), Second Language Learning
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Ralf Giessler – Language Awareness, 2024
This paper reports on a pilot study with advanced EFL learners in Germany who were asked to use ProWritingAid (PWA) for a composition task in a German comprehensive school. PWA is an Automated Writing Evaluation (AWE) tool that provides writers with feedback on grammar, spelling mistakes, and writing style during the writing and editing process.…
Descriptors: Writing Evaluation, Writing Instruction, Foreign Countries, English (Second Language)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Koji Osawa – RELC Journal: A Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2024
With the recent rapid technological advance, second language (L2) educators have increasingly incorporated technologies into writing pedagogy. Two of the major technologies to promote L2 writing are e-portfolios and automated written corrective feedback (AWCF). Notably, feedback-rich portfolios facilitate L2 learners' self-regulation and writing…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Software, Writing Instruction, Writing Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Christina Andrade; Amber Roshay – CATESOL Journal, 2023
Giving effective writing feedback can be a challenge for any English instructor. Teaching students how to provide peer feedback can be problematic as well. Both these challenges may seem even more apparent when teaching online during a pandemic. Using Google Docs for collaborative writing feedback is one effective method for addressing both these…
Descriptors: Computer Software, Collaborative Writing, English (Second Language), Second Language Learning
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Traga Philippakos, Zoi A. – Language and Literacy Spectrum, 2022
The paper explains the role of oral language and dialogic interactions in the development of individual thinking and reasoning processes. Collaborative reasoning and its contribution is explained while examples are shared to illustrate ways to scaffold students' questioning, meaning making, and writing in the context of read alouds during…
Descriptors: Oral Language, Cooperative Learning, Scaffolding (Teaching Technique), Debate
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Alsabahi, Randa – English Language Teaching, 2022
This critical exploratory study aims to examine the role academic brokers play in opening (or not) the gates to non-first-language-English (NFLE) scholars to contribute to the global research conversation. For the study, a qualitative research approach was used to collect data; ten emergent and established researchers were interviewed, all of whom…
Descriptors: English (Second Language), Second Language Learning, Authors, Writing for Publication
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Zhang, Mo; Bennett, Randy E.; Deane, Paul; van Rijn, Peter W. – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2019
This study compared gender groups on the processes used in writing essays in an online assessment. Middle-school students from four grades responded to essays in two persuasive subgenres, argumentation and policy recommendation. Writing processes were inferred from four indicators extracted from students' keystroke logs. In comparison to males, on…
Descriptors: Gender Differences, Essays, Computer Assisted Testing, Persuasive Discourse
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Sangeetha, Valentina – International Journal of Instruction, 2020
Producing error-free compositions in academic context is a big challenge for English as a Foreign Language (EFL) students. Since the editing and revision stage plays a significant role in the writing process in enhancing students' writing skills, there have always been various notions on applying an appropriate type of feedback method by the…
Descriptors: Second Language Learning, Second Language Instruction, English (Second Language), Editing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Samarasekara, Dulani; Mlsna, Todd; Mlsna, Deb – Journal of College Science Teaching, 2020
Students in an upper-division Environmental Chemistry course used peer review and response to reviewer comments to improve their writing skills. The process employed an anonymous and timed in-class Peer Review Format. In addition to editing peer papers, students were tasked to create a Response to Reviewer Comments document, which the authors used…
Descriptors: Peer Evaluation, Feedback (Response), Writing Evaluation, Writing Skills
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Guo, Hongwen; Zhang, Mo; Deane, Paul; Bennett, Randy E. – Journal of Educational Data Mining, 2020
This study investigates the effects of a scenario-based assessment design on students' writing processes. An experimental data set consisting of four design conditions was used in which the number of scenarios (one or two) and the placement of the essay task with respect to the lead-in tasks (first vs. last) were varied. Students' writing…
Descriptors: Instructional Effectiveness, Vignettes, Writing Processes, Learning Analytics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Chen, Zhenzhen; Chen, Weichao; Jia, Jiyou; Le, Huixiao – Language Learning & Technology, 2022
Despite the growing interest in investigating the pedagogical application of Automated Writing Evaluation (AWE) systems, studies on the process of AWE-supported writing are still scant. Adopting activity theory as the framework, this qualitative study aims to examine how students incorporated AWE feedback into their writing in an English as a…
Descriptors: Writing Instruction, Writing Processes, Teaching Methods, Learning Strategies
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5