NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 59 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Chen, Zhenzhen; Chen, Weichao; Jia, Jiyou; Le, Huixiao – Language Learning & Technology, 2022
Despite the growing interest in investigating the pedagogical application of Automated Writing Evaluation (AWE) systems, studies on the process of AWE-supported writing are still scant. Adopting activity theory as the framework, this qualitative study aims to examine how students incorporated AWE feedback into their writing in an English as a…
Descriptors: Writing Instruction, Writing Processes, Teaching Methods, Learning Strategies
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Ma, Qing – Computer Assisted Language Learning, 2020
This study investigated how one type of learner-generated information and content, i.e. inter-group peer online feedback, provided on a wiki writing assignment for an English for Academic Purposes (EAP) course, could contribute to student L2 writing. Using a mixed method approach, more than 1000 entries of online peer comments were collected,…
Descriptors: English for Academic Purposes, Second Language Learning, Second Language Instruction, Collaborative Writing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Yim, Soobin; Warschauer, Mark – Language Learning & Technology, 2017
The increasingly widespread use of social software (e.g., Wikis, Google Docs) in second language (L2) settings has brought a renewed attention to collaborative writing. Although the current methodological approaches to examining collaborative writing are valuable to understand L2 students' interactional patterns or perceived experiences, they can…
Descriptors: Collaborative Writing, Second Language Learning, Second Language Instruction, Writing Processes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Fazel, Ismaeil – Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 2013
After a brief discussion of the importance of publishing in academic journals, this paper provides an overview of studies on writing for publication of NNES (non-native English speaking) writers. Based on the related literature, different language problems facing NNES contributors, from the perspective of both NNES writers and journal editors, as…
Descriptors: Writing for Publication, Journal Articles, English (Second Language), Second Language Learning
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Daneman, Meredyth; Stainton, Murray – Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 1993
Finds that subjects were less able to detect errors in self-generated essays than in unfamiliar other-generated essays but were better able to detect errors in familiar other-generated essays than in unfamiliar ones. Finds also that the disadvantage for proofreading self-generated text is a by-product of extreme familiarity. (RS)
Descriptors: Editing, Higher Education, Proofreading, Reading
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Haugen, Diane – Technical Communication, 1991
Reviews the research literature to show that academics and practicing editors do not share the same view of the editing process: academics emphasize "intentional diagnoses," and practitioners perform "rule-based" editing. Discusses editing in the workplace, and notes that the editor can be of most service to the writer through involvement in the…
Descriptors: Editing, Editors, Literature Reviews, Technical Writing
Gentry, Larry A. – 1980
Recent studies and theoretical constructs pertaining to textual revision (the process of editing and reformulating written discourse) are discussed. The relative effectiveness of various revision strategies is examined, with particular attention given to different strategies employed by skilled and unskilled writers. Implications for researchers…
Descriptors: Editing, Literature Reviews, Writing (Composition), Writing Instruction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Gerich, Carol – Technical Communication: Journal of the Society for Technical Communication, 1994
Describes revision as practiced at a major scientific research and development laboratory. Shows how scientific authors, technical editors, colleague reviewers, and supervisors team up in a collaborative approach in which editors provide substantive revisions early in the collaborative review process. Argues that editors should become involved at…
Descriptors: Case Studies, Editing, Editors, Revision (Written Composition)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Walters, Timothy N.; And Others – Public Relations Review, 1994
Compares the grammatical structure of original press releases with the resultant placements in daily newspapers. Finds that, in their use of press releases, journalists almost always have to make them simpler, shorter, easier to read, and less passive. (SR)
Descriptors: Editing, Higher Education, Newspapers, Public Relations
Boyd, Sally; McDowall, Sue – 2001
This report presents the findings from a 2-stage, multi-method study conducted in 2000 and 2001 on the editing skills and processes which students at two schools in New Zealand used when working with word processors and with pencils. The study's main aim was to examine the influence of the use of a word processor on students' editing processes and…
Descriptors: Editing, Elementary Education, Interviews, Word Processing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Perry, Devern J. – Technical Communication: Journal of the Society for Technical Communication, 1996
Presents results of a national study in which members of the Society for Technical Communication rated the relevance of 20 selected English-usage principles that were considered to be of limited importance in a previous study involving textbook editors and communication instructors. Shows that all 20 principles were rated as important to…
Descriptors: Editing, Grammar, Higher Education, Language Usage
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
McCutchen, Deborah; And Others – Written Communication, 1987
Describes two studies that investigated the editing strategies used by college basic writing students as they corrected sentence-level errors in controlled editing tasks. Indicates that, in both studies, students showed two clearly different editing strategies: a consulting strategy and an intuiting strategy. (JD)
Descriptors: Behavior Patterns, Editing, Error Patterns, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Timmons, Theresa Cullen – Teaching English in the Two-Year College, 1987
Indicates that using highlighters to mark errors produced a 76% class improvement in removing comma errors and a 95.5% improvement in removing apostrophe errors. Outlines two teaching procedures, to be followed before introducing this tool to the class, that enable students to remove errors at this effective rate. (JD)
Descriptors: Editing, Instructional Materials, Punctuation, Revision (Written Composition)
Book, Virginia Alm; And Others – Technical Writing Teacher, 1982
Contains citations for reviews, and articles on the technical writing profession, pedagogy, research, technical writing and the computer, and editing. (HTH)
Descriptors: Bibliographies, Computers, Editing, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Haugen, Diane – Research in the Teaching of English, 1990
Examines differences between composition researchers and communication professionals in use of the term "editing." Argues for cooperation between these two groups to develop an interdisciplinary definition of editing to bring consistency to research, precision to the editing process, and substantial advance in the bridge between theory…
Descriptors: Definitions, Editing, Editors, Interdisciplinary Approach
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4