Descriptor
| Affective Measures | 1 |
| Art Education | 1 |
| Art Teachers | 1 |
| Back to Basics | 1 |
| Creative Thinking | 1 |
| Educational Change | 1 |
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
| Humanistic Education | 1 |
| Problem Solving | 1 |
| Student Development | 1 |
| Thinking Skills | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Design for Arts in Education | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 1 |
| Teachers | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedMittler, Gene A.; Stinespring, John A. – Design for Arts in Education, 1991
Suggests that educational reform efforts, such as the back-to-basics movement, leave art educators wondering whether visual arts instruction will survive the reforms. Argues that the three Rs are insufficient for a balanced education. Asserts that the arts foster both affective and cognitive development. (KM)
Descriptors: Affective Measures, Art Education, Art Teachers, Back to Basics
