Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
Source
Journal of Education for… | 5 |
American School Board Journal | 1 |
Hezel Associates (NJ1) | 1 |
Office of Planning,… | 1 |
US Department of Education | 1 |
Author
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 6 |
Reports - Descriptive | 5 |
Reports - Evaluative | 4 |
Opinion Papers | 2 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
Elementary Education | 1 |
High Schools | 1 |
Middle Schools | 1 |
Audience
Policymakers | 2 |
Practitioners | 1 |
Location
South Carolina | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Improving Americas Schools… | 13 |
Elementary and Secondary… | 3 |
No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 3 |
Goals 2000 | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating

Billig, Shelley H.; Perry, Suzanne; Pokorny, Nancy – Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 1999
Studied how school support-team systems have been developed and implemented across the United States. Responses from 43 state education agencies show that most states still do not have operating school-support systems in place, but those that do have varying outcomes based on a variety of program characteristics. (SLD)
Descriptors: Compensatory Education, Educational Improvement, Educational Planning, Program Effectiveness
Harrington-Lueker, Donna – American School Board Journal, 1997
Teachers at Pawtucket, Rhode Island, schools are developing a new approach to Title I, the federal program for disadvantaged students. Included are high academic standards, ongoing professional development, and developing a long-range plan. A sidebar lists web sites that offer information on Title I programs, especially effective schoolwide…
Descriptors: Academic Standards, Educational Change, Educational Improvement, Educationally Disadvantaged
Dominguez, Paula Szulc; Nicholls, Craig; Storandt, Barbara – Hezel Associates (NJ1), 2006
To shed light on how states can use school performance data to support failing schools, the present study examined a subset of underperforming schools in South Carolina in the wake of a series of state-supported interventions. The study, part of a comprehensive evaluation of the South Carolina External Review Team Program, made extensive use of…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Intervention, Educational Improvement, Accountability

McDonald, Judith – Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 1999
Examines changes in the 1994 reauthorization of Title I that shift flexibility and accountability to local schools and explores implications of these changes for the 1999 reauthorization. Congress will need to determine whether the structure of the Improving America's Schools Act is adequate to bring about educational improvement for all students.…
Descriptors: Accountability, Agenda Setting, Compensatory Education, Disadvantaged Youth

Le Tendre, Mary Jean – Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 1996
Discusses changes in the Improving America's Schools Act (IASA) and Title I designed to help disadvantaged students meet the higher academic standards of school reform. Changes include emphasizing high-quality teaching and professional development, shifting decision making to the school level, creating a link between Title I and other IASA…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, At Risk Persons, Economically Disadvantaged, Educational Facilities Improvement

Carroll, Janet – Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 1996
Argues that policy development framework for school reform under the Improving America's Schools Act of 1994 must occur in state and local settings and possess advocates for at-risk students who can enter the community dialog concerning education. Policies should focus on the classroom with administrators and teachers continually striving for…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Advocacy, At Risk Persons, Economically Disadvantaged
Wong, Kenneth K., Comp.; Meyer, Stephen, Comp. – 1998
The largest single federal investment in schooling, Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (P.L. 103-382) has provided supplementary resources to schools with large numbers of low-income students throughout the past three decades. In 1994 the program was reauthorized according to the Improving America's Schools Act (IASA), which…
Descriptors: Compensatory Education, Disadvantaged Youth, Educational Improvement, Educationally Disadvantaged
US Department of Education, 2005
"Evaluation of Title I Accountability Systems and School Improvement Efforts: Findings from 2002-03" examines the implementation of Title I accountability systems and school improvement efforts at the state, district and school levels. Based on surveys of all states, a nationally representative sample of districts, and a sample of…
Descriptors: Program Evaluation, Accountability, Educational Legislation, Federal Legislation
Padilla, Christine; Woodworth, Katrina; Lash, Andrea; Shields, Patrick M.; Laguarda, Katrina G. – Office of Planning, Evaluation and Policy Development, US Department of Education, 2005
"The No Child Left Behind Act" (NCLB) aims to strengthen state Title I accountability systems to spur the improvement needed to reach the law's goals: that all students will reach proficiency by 2013-14. NCLB requires states and districts to report and act on student test results in a host of new ways. Among the many actions states and…
Descriptors: Program Evaluation, Accountability, Educational Legislation, Federal Legislation

Le Tendre, Mary Jean – Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 1997
Funds from Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act and its successive amendments provide school districts with the means to help children who are often served last, those in high poverty schools. Homeless, migrant, neglected, and delinquent children are among those to whom Title I can give a voice. (SLD)
Descriptors: Child Neglect, Compensatory Education, Delinquency, Disadvantaged Youth
Wong, Kenneth K.; And Others – 1996
This article presents data on four schools in the Minneapolis (Minnesota) Public School District that are implementing schoolwide projects under Title I. The Title I schoolwide project was adopted in Minneapolis in 1990 to accommodate a growing population of low-income, educationally disadvantaged students in the primary grades. Evaluation of…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Achievement Gains, Compensatory Education, Disadvantaged Youth
North Central Regional Educational Lab., Oak Brook, IL. – 1996
The Association of State Assessment Programs, an informal association of state assessment directors, began collecting information about large-scale assessment programs in 1977. This report is a continuation of that effort that is currently conducted by the North Central Regional Educational Laboratory and the Council of Chief State School…
Descriptors: Accountability, Constructed Response, Criterion Referenced Tests, Educational Assessment
Chait, Robin; Hardcastle, Daphne; Kotzin, Stacy; LaPointe, Michelle; Miller, Meredith; Rimdzius, Tracy; Sanchez, Susan; Scott, Elois; Stullich, Stephanie; Thompson-Hoffman, Susan – 2001
This report provides a comprehensive summary of the most recent data available from the National Assessment of Title I on the implementation of the Title I program and the academic performance of children in high poverty schools. Seven sections focus on: (1) "Policy Context for Title I" (provisions of the current Title I law and new…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Academic Standards, Accountability, Compensatory Education