Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 44 |
Descriptor
Source
Thomas B. Fordham Institute | 44 |
Author
Publication Type
Reports - Evaluative | 34 |
Numerical/Quantitative Data | 7 |
Reports - Research | 5 |
Reports - Descriptive | 4 |
Opinion Papers | 2 |
Legal/Legislative/Regulatory… | 1 |
Education Level
Elementary Secondary Education | 37 |
Elementary Education | 30 |
Middle Schools | 30 |
Grade 3 | 29 |
Grade 4 | 29 |
Grade 5 | 29 |
Grade 6 | 29 |
Grade 7 | 29 |
Grade 8 | 29 |
High Schools | 3 |
Secondary Education | 1 |
More ▼ |
Audience
Policymakers | 1 |
Location
Ohio | 7 |
United States | 4 |
Arizona | 3 |
California | 3 |
Colorado | 3 |
Delaware | 3 |
Idaho | 3 |
Illinois | 3 |
Indiana | 3 |
Kansas | 3 |
Maine | 3 |
More ▼ |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 33 |
Elementary and Secondary… | 1 |
Race to the Top | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
National Assessment of… | 3 |
Program for International… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Petrilli, Michael J.; Griffith, David; Wright, Brandon L.; Kim, Audrey – Thomas B. Fordham Institute, 2016
In this report, the authors examine the extent to which states' current (or planned) accountability systems for elementary and middle schools attend to the needs of high-achieving students, and how these systems might be redesigned under the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) to better serve all students. In their view, states can and should take…
Descriptors: Accountability, High Achievement, Student Needs, Needs Assessment
Petrilli, Michael J.; Griffith, David; Wright, Brandon L. – Thomas B. Fordham Institute, 2016
A companion piece to "High Stakes for High Achievers: State Accountability in the Age of ESSA," this report appraises states' current (or planned) accountability systems as they affect high-achieving students in high school. They were examined and rated based on whether they incorporate under the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) the…
Descriptors: High Stakes Tests, Accountability, State Regulation, State Standards
Wohlstetter, Priscilla; Zeehandelaar, Dara – Thomas B. Fordham Institute, 2015
This paper examines thirty major American cities to determine how "choice-friendly" they are today. Selected for their size and geographic diversity, the cities reveal both the best and worst conditions for school choice to take root and grow. "School choice" is defined broadly to incorporate a wide range of public and private…
Descriptors: Municipalities, Urban Areas, School Choice, Educational Indicators
Churchill, Aaron – Thomas B. Fordham Institute, 2014
On September 12th, Ohio released school report-card ratings for the 2013-14 school year. This report compiles and analyzes the statewide data, with special attention given to the quality of public schools in the Ohio Big Eight urban areas: Akron, Canton, Cincinnati, Cleveland, Columbus, Dayton, Toledo, and Youngstown (both district and charter…
Descriptors: Report Cards, Educational Assessment, Educational Quality, Public Schools
Thomas B. Fordham Institute, 2011
Ohio has made tremendous strides in education reform over the past half year. Yet even regarding these accomplishments, the work is not done. Virtually all of the state's recent education policy changes come with implementation challenges and sustainability concerns. This paper presents a list that offers praise for the positive changes Ohio has…
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Educational Change, Educational Policy, Politics of Education
Thomas B. Fordham Institute, 2011
With the release of Ohio's state test score data each August, one recurring question is how well have the state's large sector of charter schools performed relative to their counterparts in traditional districts? The Thomas B. Fordham Institute commissioned Public Impact to conduct an analysis of the 2009-10 data in this report. Using public…
Descriptors: Urban Schools, Charter Schools, State Standards, Low Achievement
Stern, Sheldon M.; Stern, Jeremy A. – Thomas B. Fordham Institute, 2011
This study is the Thomas B. Fordham Institute's first review of the quality of state U.S. history standards since 2003. Key findings include: (1) A majority of states' standards are mediocre-to-awful. The average grade across "all" states is barely a D. In twenty-eight jurisdictions--a majority of states--the history standards earn Ds or…
Descriptors: United States History, State Standards, State Surveys, Audits (Verification)
Wolfe, Christine O. – Thomas B. Fordham Institute, 2009
The purpose of this paper is to promote clearer understanding of the graduation-rate debate by distilling the policy developments and controversy surrounding the measurement of these rates over the last decade. The paper concludes with a discussion of the move toward a federally mandated common metric for graduation rates. The No Child Left Behind…
Descriptors: Graduation Rate, Federal Legislation, Educational Improvement, Federal Programs
Thomas B. Fordham Institute, 2012
Student mobility is the phenomenon of students in grades K-12 changing schools for reasons other than customary promotion from elementary school to middle school or from middle school to high school. This non-promotional school change can occur during the school year or in the summer between school years. It may involve residential change, school…
Descriptors: Open Enrollment, Charter Schools, Outcomes of Education, Achievement Tests
Carmichael, Sheila Byrd; Martino, Gabrielle; Porter-Magee, Kathleen; Wilson, W. Stephen – Thomas B. Fordham Institute, 2010
This review of state English language arts (ELA) and mathematics standards is the latest in a series of Fordham evaluations dating back to 1997. It comes at a critical juncture, as states across the land consider adoption of the Common Core State Standards. These are the authors' major findings: (1) Based on their criteria, the Common Core…
Descriptors: State Standards, Mathematics Education, Language Arts, English Curriculum
Petrilli, Michael J.; Finn, Chester E., Jr. – Thomas B. Fordham Institute, 2011
President Obama and congressional leaders have vowed to take action this year on the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), most recently reauthorized and rebranded as the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. While most observers remain skeptical that everyone will actually see a signing ceremony in 2011, it does appear likely that at least…
Descriptors: Credentials, Salaries, Teacher Effectiveness, Elementary Secondary Education
Finn, Chester E., Jr.; Hentges, Christina M.; Petrilli, Michael J.; Winkler, Amber M. – Thomas B. Fordham Institute, 2009
Critics of school voucher programs argue that private schools that receive taxpayer dollars should be held accountable to the same standards as public schools. School choice supporters counter that private schools should be left alone to answer to the parents of their students. The authors advocate for a re-visit to the discussion of…
Descriptors: Educational Vouchers, Private Schools, Accountability, Disclosure
Finn, Chester E. Jr., Petrilli, Michael J. – Thomas B. Fordham Institute, 2008
In this exciting, unique and challenging time, the Thomas B. Fordham Institute wants to congratulate President-Elect Obama and other new federal leaders. The federal government has a key role to play in creating a world-class education system in America but it's challenging to get that role right. This letter provides some guidance. Fordham…
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Educational Finance, Federal Government, Educational Policy
Ballard, Amy; Palmieri, Stafford; Winkler, Amber – Thomas B. Fordham Institute, 2008
This report has a simple aim: to present results from international assessments so readers can judge for themselves how American students stack up globally. It's intended to be a stand-alone supplement to the "Education Olympics" web event held between August 8th and August 22nd, 2008 (see edolympics.net). It shows how the U.S. has…
Descriptors: International Studies, Academic Achievement, Program Effectiveness, Foreign Countries
Thomas B. Fordham Institute, 2009
The intent of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001 is to hold schools accountable for ensuring that all their students achieve mastery in reading and math, with a particular focus on groups that have traditionally been left behind. Under NCLB, states submit accountability plans to the U.S. Department of Education detailing the rules and…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Educational Improvement, Educational Indicators, Federal Programs