Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Educational Legislation | 3 |
Federal Legislation | 3 |
Program Effectiveness | 3 |
Sanctions | 3 |
Accountability | 2 |
Federal Programs | 2 |
Academic Achievement | 1 |
Achievement Gains | 1 |
Administrator Attitudes | 1 |
At Risk Students | 1 |
Colleges | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Reports - Research | 2 |
Journal Articles | 1 |
Legal/Legislative/Regulatory… | 1 |
Education Level
Elementary Education | 2 |
Junior High Schools | 2 |
Middle Schools | 2 |
Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
Grade 3 | 1 |
Grade 4 | 1 |
Grade 5 | 1 |
Grade 6 | 1 |
Grade 7 | 1 |
Grade 8 | 1 |
Intermediate Grades | 1 |
More ▼ |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 2 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Daly, Alan J. – Educational Administration Quarterly, 2009
Purpose: The No Child Left Behind Act laudably brings social justice and equity issues to the forefront; however, the act's threat- and sanction-driven methods are not only increasing stress levels but potentially causing a rigid response, especially in the growing population of schools labeled "program improvement" (PI). Specifically,…
Descriptors: Social Justice, Sanctions, Trust (Psychology), Federal Legislation
Ballou, Dale; Springer, Matthew G. – Urban Institute (NJ1), 2009
Under the No Child Left Behind Act, states have been required to set minimum proficiency standards that virtually all students must meet by 2014. Sanctions of increasing severity are to be applied to schools that fail to meet interim targets, known as Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP). The authors examine the effect of this legislation using…
Descriptors: Sanctions, Federal Legislation, Educational Assessment, Educational Improvement
Blanchette, Cornelia M. – 1995
This report examines the effectiveness of recent federal government efforts through amendments to the Higher Education Act (1993) to reduce student loan defaults. Key measures to curb defaults had been to make schools with high student loan default rates ineligible for federal student loan programs. However, many institutions have challenged…
Descriptors: Colleges, Compliance (Legal), Educational Legislation, Eligibility