Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 1 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Educational Objectives | 3 |
| Institutional Characteristics | 3 |
| Program Content | 3 |
| Doctoral Programs | 2 |
| Access to Education | 1 |
| Administrator Attitudes | 1 |
| Barriers | 1 |
| College Role | 1 |
| Computer Science Education | 1 |
| Deans | 1 |
| Educational Needs | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Annie M. Wofford | 1 |
| Anum Fatima | 1 |
| Bouckaert, Geert | 1 |
| Chantra Nhien | 1 |
| Clark, Mary Jo | 1 |
| K. Bret Staudt Willet | 1 |
| Lara Perez-Felkner | 1 |
| Xinting Wu | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Information Analyses | 1 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Annie M. Wofford; Anum Fatima; Xinting Wu; Lara Perez-Felkner; Chantra Nhien; K. Bret Staudt Willet – Innovative Higher Education, 2025
Despite consistent growth in computing-related fields, challenges persist in advancing racial equity--especially within doctoral programs. Minority-Serving Institutions (MSIs) increasingly offer graduate programs. Yet, MSIs are often overlooked in graduate student pathways to computing degrees and careers. Leveraging multiple methodological…
Descriptors: Minority Serving Institutions, College Role, Access to Education, Doctoral Programs
Bouckaert, Geert – Teaching Public Administration, 2013
The question of whether the field of public administration education is prepared for the future of the public sector in Europe is a complex one, which needs to be unpacked to give a grounded answer. Unpacking this question means that there needs to be discussions on not just what educating the field of public administration means, but also…
Descriptors: Reflection, Public Administration, Barriers, Public Administration Education
Clark, Mary Jo – 1974
Graduate school deans were surveyed to identify characteristics indicating Ph.D. program quality, as well as acceptable ways to measure such characteristics. Doctoral programs in many different fields of study were considered, but three purposes of a Ph.D. program were emphasized: the training of scholarly researchers, college teachers, and…
Descriptors: Administrator Attitudes, Deans, Doctoral Programs, Educational Objectives

Peer reviewed
Direct link
