Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Accountability | 2 |
| Educational Improvement | 2 |
| Educational Policy | 2 |
| Program Evaluation | 2 |
| Sanctions | 2 |
| Achievement Gains | 1 |
| Achievement Gap | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Compliance (Legal) | 1 |
| Educational Indicators | 1 |
| Educational Legislation | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Dissertations/Theses -… | 1 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
| California | 2 |
| Florida | 1 |
| Kentucky | 1 |
| Maryland | 1 |
| New York | 1 |
| North Carolina | 1 |
| Texas | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Direct linkVan Horn, Mark Louis – ProQuest LLC, 2012
In 1999, California was among the first schools in the nation to initiate an accountability model for public education using a method for system measurement of academic improvement constructed on the bedrock of standards-based education. The State also included a new twist...sanctions. Schools that failed to make expected progress, as measured…
Descriptors: Program Evaluation, Accountability, Sanctions, Educational Legislation
Download full textMintrop, Heinrich; Trujillo, Tina – National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST), 2005
This paper explores what lessons can be learned from the experiences of states that instituted NCLB-like accountability systems prior to 2001 (here called first-generation accountability systems). It looks at the experiences of three smaller states (Kentucky, Maryland, North Carolina), four larger ones (California, Florida, New York, Texas), and…
Descriptors: Educational Policy, Compliance (Legal), State Officials, Federal Legislation
