Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
| Comparative Analysis | 3 |
| Educational Practices | 3 |
| Neurosciences | 3 |
| Elementary Secondary Education | 2 |
| Neuropsychology | 2 |
| Academic Achievement | 1 |
| Brain Hemisphere Functions | 1 |
| Child Development | 1 |
| Citation Analysis | 1 |
| Cognitive Development | 1 |
| Cohort Analysis | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Information Analyses | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Secondary Education | 2 |
| Early Childhood Education | 1 |
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
| Preschool Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Turkey | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Download full textPhillips, Bernadette – Journal of Montessori Research, 2022
The Neurosequential Model in Education (NME) is described as a developmentally sensitive and biologically respectful approach to development and learning. This paper postulates that the NME shares many commonalities with the Montessori Method in that it, too, is developmentally sensitive and adheres to biologically respectful concepts. This paper…
Descriptors: Models, Montessori Method, Child Development, Developmental Stages
Research Base for Improved Classroom Learning: Brain or Behavior? Evidence Speaks Reports, Vol 1, #9
Direct linkBruer, John T. – Center on Children and Families at Brookings, 2015
Implicit in recent Evidence Speaks postings is the need to develop evidence-based interventions for improving student achievement. Comparative analysis of the education research literature versus the educational neuroscience literature suggests that education research, grounded in the behavioral and cognitive sciences, is currently the better…
Descriptors: Evidence Based Practice, Intervention, Student Improvement, Academic Achievement
Canbulat, Tuncay; Kiriktas, Halit – Journal of Education and Learning, 2017
The aim of study is to determine the neuromyth level of teachers and pre-teachers and reveal if there is significant difference in terms of some variables (gender, class, etc.). Research was designed in survey model. The research sample was formed with 241 teachers and 511 teacher candidates. In the collection of data, "Educational neuromyths…
Descriptors: Educational Practices, Misconceptions, Predictor Variables, Gender Differences
