Descriptor
Adaptive Testing | 4 |
Comparative Testing | 4 |
Elementary Education | 4 |
Achievement Tests | 3 |
Computer Assisted Testing | 3 |
Mathematics Tests | 3 |
Difficulty Level | 2 |
Elementary School Students | 2 |
Grade 6 | 2 |
Mathematics Achievement | 2 |
Test Items | 2 |
More ▼ |
Source
Journal of Educational… | 1 |
Publication Type
Reports - Research | 4 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 2 |
Journal Articles | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Researchers | 1 |
Location
California | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Stanford Achievement Tests | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Olsen, James B.; And Others – 1986
Student achievement test scores were compared and equated, using three different testing methods: paper-administered, computer-administered, and computerized adaptive testing. The tests were developed from third and sixth grade mathematics item banks of the California Assessment Program. The paper and the computer-administered tests were identical…
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Adaptive Testing, Comparative Testing, Computer Assisted Testing
McBride, James R. – 1985
The advantages of computerized adaptive testing are discussed, and an example illustrates its use in sixth grade mathematics. These tests are administered at a computer terminal, and the test items to be administered are selected according to the difficulty level appropriate to the individual's ability. Tailoring increases the psychometric…
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Adaptive Testing, Comparative Testing, Computer Assisted Testing

Wise, Steven L.; And Others – 1993
A new testing strategy that provides protection against the problem of having examinees in adaptive testing choose difficulty levels that are not matched to their proficiency levels was introduced and evaluated. The method, termed restricted self-adapted testing (RSAT), still provides examinees with a degree of control over the difficulty levels…
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Adaptive Testing, Comparative Testing, Computer Assisted Testing

Davis-Dorsey, Judy; And Others – Journal of Educational Psychology, 1991
The impact of personalizing mathematical word problems and rewording them for explicitness was tested with 68 second and 59 fifth graders. Second graders benefited from personalization and rewording in combination; fifth graders benefited from personalization, not rewording. Personalization makes problems more motivating and easier to represent…
Descriptors: Achievement Gains, Adaptive Testing, Age Differences, Comparative Testing