Descriptor
| Elementary Secondary Education | 3 |
| Learning Disabilities | 3 |
| Models | 2 |
| Validity | 2 |
| Cognitive Style | 1 |
| Data Interpretation | 1 |
| Decision Making | 1 |
| Educational Diagnosis | 1 |
| Eligibility | 1 |
| Evaluation Methods | 1 |
| Handicap Identification | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Learning Disabilities… | 3 |
Author
| Forness, Steven R. | 1 |
| Fuchs, Douglas | 1 |
| Fuchs, Lynn S. | 1 |
| Harris, Karen R. | 1 |
| Hirshoren, Alfred | 1 |
| Kavale, Kenneth A. | 1 |
| Reid, Robert | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
| Researchers | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Slosson Intelligence Test | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedKavale, Kenneth A.; Hirshoren, Alfred; Forness, Steven R. – Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 1998
Synthesizes findings from 36 studies that validated the Dunn and Dunn Model of Learning-Style Preferences. Questions are raised regarding the validity of the model, the nature of the literature base, the interpretation of the meta-analytic findings, and the conclusions. The article concludes that the model has not been adequately validated.…
Descriptors: Cognitive Style, Data Interpretation, Elementary Secondary Education, Learning Disabilities
Peer reviewedHarris, Karen R.; Reid, Robert – Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 1991
This critical evaluation of the Slosson Intelligence Test (SIT) determined that the test items are 30 years old, scores are derived from a nonrepresentative norm group, and scores are not interchangeable with other intelligence measures. The paper concludes that the SIT is unsuited for educational decision-making purposes, including screening,…
Descriptors: Educational Diagnosis, Elementary Secondary Education, Handicap Identification, Intelligence Tests
Peer reviewedFuchs, Lynn S.; Fuchs, Douglas – Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 1998
Proposes a treatment-validity model for the identification of learning disabilities. The four-phase eligibility-assessment process would include evaluating adaptations in the regular classroom and verifying the effectiveness of special education before placement. Considers the technical requirements of this alternative eligibility process, and the…
Descriptors: Decision Making, Elementary Secondary Education, Eligibility, Evaluation Methods
