Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
Classification | 3 |
Elementary Secondary Education | 3 |
Testing Programs | 3 |
Accountability | 2 |
Achievement Tests | 2 |
State Programs | 2 |
Academic Achievement | 1 |
Comparative Analysis | 1 |
Criterion Referenced Tests | 1 |
Educational Assessment | 1 |
Evaluation Methods | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Grantee Submission | 1 |
Author
Buckendahl, Chad W. | 1 |
Cai, Li | 1 |
Follettie, Joseph F. | 1 |
Hansen, Mark | 1 |
Impara, James C. | 1 |
Li, Zhen | 1 |
Monroe, Scott | 1 |
Plake, Barbara S. | 1 |
Publication Type
Reports - Research | 2 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Nebraska | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
National Assessment of… | 1 |
Trends in International… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Hansen, Mark; Cai, Li; Monroe, Scott; Li, Zhen – Grantee Submission, 2016
Despite the growing popularity of diagnostic classification models (e.g., Rupp, Templin, & Henson, 2010) in educational and psychological measurement, methods for testing their absolute goodness-of-fit to real data remain relatively underdeveloped. For tests of reasonable length and for realistic sample size, full-information test statistics…
Descriptors: Goodness of Fit, Item Response Theory, Classification, Maximum Likelihood Statistics
Buckendahl, Chad W.; Impara, James C.; Plake, Barbara S. – 2000
Because districts in Nebraska are not measured on common instruments, comparisons are difficult. This study examined a district evaluation strategy that classifies districts into school performance ratings (SPR) based on a combination of three factors. Student performance and non-cognitive indicator data for three grade levels and two content…
Descriptors: Accountability, Classification, Comparative Analysis, Elementary Secondary Education
Follettie, Joseph F. – 1976
General features of local and national programs for assessing achievements referencing the common instruction are discussed within a single mastery achievement testing framework. The envisioned programs differ only in informative detail. Most such differences are viewed as amenable to formalization and the basis for distinguishing between local…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Accountability, Achievement Tests, Classification