Descriptor
Discipline Policy | 124 |
Due Process | 124 |
Elementary Secondary Education | 124 |
Student Rights | 91 |
Court Litigation | 64 |
School Law | 56 |
Suspension | 47 |
Disabilities | 38 |
Expulsion | 32 |
Legal Responsibility | 32 |
Student Behavior | 23 |
More ▼ |
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
Practitioners | 32 |
Administrators | 20 |
Policymakers | 9 |
Parents | 5 |
Students | 4 |
Teachers | 2 |
Location
New York | 4 |
Texas | 3 |
Canada | 2 |
Colorado | 2 |
Missouri | 2 |
Ohio | 2 |
Oregon | 2 |
Florida | 1 |
Kentucky | 1 |
Minnesota | 1 |
New Jersey | 1 |
More ▼ |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating

Sachs, John J.; And Others – Education, 1992
This discussion of corporal punishment as an aversive intervention with regular and special education students notes that corporal punishment is still legal and being used in many states. Special problems in the use of corporal punishment with students having disabilities are noted. The paper concludes that comprehensive procedural safeguards for…
Descriptors: Corporal Punishment, Disabilities, Discipline Policy, Due Process

Hobbs, Gardner J. – Clearing House, 1979
Historically, public school officials have acted without consideration for due process in issuing grades to students, in excluding students from school for academic failure, and in lowering grades as a means of disciplining students. The constitutionality of these actions is challenged and recent court cases are reviewed. (Author/KC)
Descriptors: Court Litigation, Discipline Policy, Due Process, Elementary Secondary Education
Young, Don J. – NOLPE School Law Journal, 1974
Discusses the relationship between the courts and the schools as it affects the role and responsibilities of school administrators, with particular emphasis on the area of school discipline and the use of punitive suspension and expulsion. (JG)
Descriptors: Administrator Role, Court Role, Discipline Policy, Due Process
Nolte, M. Chester – American School Board Journal, 1975
Discusses the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Goss v. Lopez that public schools may not suspend a student for 10 days or less without giving him advance notice of the charges against him and allowing him to respond to the charges. (JG)
Descriptors: Discipline Policy, Due Process, Elementary Secondary Education, School Law
Wayson, William W. – 1985
Due process in school is an educational process for teaching the students that they are valued, that authority exists, and they they belong in the social unit. Historically, due process emerged as a way of guaranteeing rights and the privileges of governmental protection to a wider range of people in English and American institutions. The…
Descriptors: Discipline Policy, Due Process, Elementary Secondary Education, Government School Relationship
Flygare, Thomas J. – Phi Delta Kappan, 1974
Descriptors: Discipline, Discipline Policy, Due Process, Elementary Secondary Education
Hobbs, Gardner J. – GAMSP Journal, 1977
This paper examines the reported decisions, one unreported decision, and two Attorney Generals' opinions that deal with school punishment for the use of drugs and alcohol off campus and with suspensions pending criminal charges for student offenses committed off school property. (Author)
Descriptors: Court Litigation, Discipline Policy, Drug Abuse, Due Process

McGhehey, M.A. – Education and Urban Society, 1982
The term "due process of law" has been overextended to apply to cases arising out of the public school system. This has resulted in increasing involvement of the judiciary in the administration of public schools, which has affected their day to day operation. (Author/MJL)
Descriptors: Constitutional Law, Court Litigation, Discipline Policy, Due Process
National Association of Secondary School Principals, Reston, VA. – 1982
The basic requirements for fair school disciplinary proceedings were set down in the Supreme Court decision of Goss v. Lopez. The requirements are that students be given oral or written notice of both the nature of the rule (violation of which will result in punishment) and the nature of the specific violation and the intended punishment. In…
Descriptors: Administrator Responsibility, Court Litigation, Disabilities, Discipline Policy

Zirkel, Perry A.; Gluckman, Ivan B. – NASSP Bulletin, 1987
Presents two legal cases involving high school students ("Birdsey v. Grand Blanc Community Schools" and "State v. Wolfer") that illustrate requirements for use of "Miranda Warnings." These warnings are not usually required to be provided in civil suits, or proceedings involved in administration of school discipline.…
Descriptors: Court Litigation, Discipline, Discipline Policy, Due Process
Arnold, Jay – Executive Educator, 1989
A Georgia school district standardized discipline procedures, codified offenses, and published the results in booklet form. A clear hierarchy of offenses specifies problems to be handled at the local school, at formal hearings, or at a special disciplinary committee. Students know what to expect, and administrators know how to proceed. (MLF)
Descriptors: Definitions, Discipline Policy, Due Process, Elementary Secondary Education

Levine, Alan H.; Kola, Arthur A. – Journal of Law and Education, 1975
Descriptors: Court Litigation, Discipline Policy, Due Process, Elementary Secondary Education

Flygare, Thomas J. – Journal of Law and Education, 1974
Examines the procedural due process challenge to short-term suspensions. (Author)
Descriptors: Discipline Policy, Due Process, Elementary Secondary Education, Equal Protection
Updating School Board Policies, 1974
Descriptors: Board of Education Policy, Discipline Policy, Due Process, Elementary Secondary Education
Demarest, Sylvia M.; Jordan, John F. – Inequality in Education, 1975
Descriptors: Court Litigation, Discipline, Discipline Policy, Due Process