NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Education Level
Audience
Location
New York1
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 83 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Warburton, I.; Prabhu, N. S. – Journal of Linguistics, 1972
Descriptors: Deep Structure, English, Grammar, Pronouns
CHAFE, WALLACE L. – 1968
THIS PAPER CONSIDERS SEVERAL TYPES OF ENGLISH SENTENCES WHICH ARE UTTERED FOR THE PURPOSE OF ELICITING A LINGUISTIC RESPONSE FROM THE HEARER AND WHICH, ON THAT BASIS, CAN BE CLASSED AS QUESTIONS. A SEMANTIC UNIT "PLUS INTERROGATIVE", WHOSE MEANING IS THAT THE SPEAKER REQUESTS NEW INFORMATION FROM THE HEARER, IS SEEN TO PLAY A ROLE IN MORE THAN ONE…
Descriptors: Deep Structure, English, Generative Grammar, Language Research
Cantrall, William R. – Michigan Linguistic Society, 1969
Projected here is an underlying structure for successive restrictive relative clauses. Observed are the principles of pronominalization determined by "command," such structure being notably different from that for successive nonrestrictive clauses. Evidence has been seen that certain variations in surface structure arise from selection…
Descriptors: Deep Structure, English, Nouns, Pronouns
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Gardner, Thomas J. – Linguistics, 1973
Consideration of the grammatical connections which might exist between certain structural types of substantival metaphors, e.g., You're a (greedy) pig!'' and You're as greedy as a pig!'' (RS)
Descriptors: Deep Structure, English, Generative Grammar, Metaphors
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
De La Cruz, Juan M. – Studia Anglica Posnaniensia, 1972
Transformational analysis of verb phrases in English is discussed. More than 150 transformations are classified arising from 10 basic kernel strings. See FL 508 197 for availability. (RM)
Descriptors: Deep Structure, English, Phrase Structure, Semantics
WALL, ROBERT – 1967
IN AGREEMENT WITH CHOMSKY, THE AUTHOR DISCUSSES SELECTIONAL RESTRICTIONS ON SUBJECTS AND OBJECTS BASED ON CRITERIA OF WHAT MUST OR CANNOT OCCUR IN THOSE SLOTS IN A SENTENCE. THROUGH AN ANALYSIS OF INTERDEPENDENCY RELATIONSHIPS, VARIOUS DEEP- AND SURFACE-STRUCTURE FEATURES ARE DISTINGUISHED CONCERNING TRANSITIVE VERBS AND THE INTERPRETATION OF…
Descriptors: Deep Structure, English, Phrase Structure, Semantics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Foster, David William – International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 1970
This article attempts to justify the surface presence of English split infinitives in terms of the deep structure of the language posited by current transformation theory." (FWB)
Descriptors: Adverbs, Deep Structure, English, Grammar
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Lee, Chungmin – Language Sciences, 1973
Why Not V?'' refers to the grammatical structure Why Not (plus) Verb?'' (RS)
Descriptors: Deep Structure, English, Sentence Structure, Structural Grammar
Hakes, David T. – Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1972
Investigation supported by a grant from the U.S. Office of Education. (VM)
Descriptors: Comprehension, Deep Structure, English, Language Research
ROSENBAUM, PETER S. – 1968
"ENGLISH GRAMMAR II" IS A TRANSFORMATIONAL FORMULATION OF THE SYNTACTIC RULES RELATING DEEP AND SURFACE STRUCTURES FOR A NUMBER OF CONSTRUCTIONS IN ENGLISH. TOPICS TREATED BY THIS GRAMMAR INCLUDE EMBEDDED SENTENCE FORMATION, RELATIVE CLAUSE FORMATION, GENITIVE CONSTRUCTIONS, TIME AND PLACE ADVERBIALS, AND A FULL RANGE OF SIMPLE SENTENCE PHENOMENA…
Descriptors: Context Free Grammar, Deep Structure, English, Phrase Structure
Babcock, Sandra Scharff – 1967
This paper is concerned with the grammar of cognate constructions, which are defined as those in which the object and verb have the same meaning ("I drank a drink of water"). In the transformational process of dissimilation the verb is replaced by "have" or "do," so that verb and object are less alike. The model used…
Descriptors: Deep Structure, English, Grammar, Linguistic Theory
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Downing, Pamela – Language, 1977
A number of experimental tasks were conducted in which subjects were asked to interpret and create novel noun-noun compounds. Results indicate that semantic relationships that hold between members of these compounds cannot be characterized in terms of a finite list of appropriate compounding relationships. (CHK)
Descriptors: Deep Structure, English, Language Research, Language Usage
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Helke, Michael – Linguistics, 1973
Descriptors: Deep Structure, English, Linguistic Theory, Phrase Structure
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Bowers, Frederick – English Quarterly, 1971
It is frequently observed that modern English has a fixed word order. Therefore, the English speaker is locked inside a syntactic system which leaves him few expressional options. The author disagrees and suggests that because of options of word order, the English speaker can impose his own level of meaning on his utterances. (Author/RR)
Descriptors: Deep Structure, English, Language Rhythm, Linguistic Theory
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Sehnert, James; Sharwood-Smith, Michael – Studia Anglica Posnaniensia, 1973
A study is made of the derivation of English verbs from instrumental prepositional phrases, and their morphology and semantic categories are discussed. (Available from: See FL 508 214.) (RM)
Descriptors: Deep Structure, Descriptive Linguistics, English, Language Patterns
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6