NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 10 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Nazarov, Zafar E.; von Schrader, Sarah – Rehabilitation Research, Policy, and Education, 2014
Purpose: We explore whether certain employer characteristics predict Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) charges and whether the same characteristics predict receipt of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act charges. Method: We estimate a set of multivariate regressions using the ordinary least squares…
Descriptors: Employer Attitudes, Employment Practices, Comparative Analysis, Employers
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Sheeder, Robert E. – Duquesne Law Review, 1980
The procedural prerequisites to an Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) action are examined. The 1978 amendments to the Act as well as the leading decisions involving procedural matters are discussed. Available from The Duquesne Law Review, 901 Rockwell Hall, 600 Forbes Ave., Pittsburgh, PA 15219. (Author/MLF)
Descriptors: Age Discrimination, Court Litigation, Equal Opportunities (Jobs), Federal Legislation
Lake, Monte – Aging and Work, 1982
Discusses the Age Discrimination in Employment Act and the interpretations of it by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (JOW)
Descriptors: Age Discrimination, Civil Rights, Court Litigation, Equal Opportunities (Jobs)
Baroni, Barry J. – Personnel Administrator, 1981
Highlights some of the main provisions of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act and its 1978 amendments and also reviews some case-law interpretations under the Act. (Author/MLF)
Descriptors: Age Discrimination, Compliance (Legal), Court Litigation, Equal Opportunities (Jobs)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Reschke, Michael W. – University of Illinois Law Forum, 1979
Discusses the original provisions of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act and the changes made in the 1978 amendments. Suggests resolutions for issues left unresolved by Congress and raised by the courts. Available from University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, College of Law, Law Building, Champaign, IL 61820 (Author/IRT)
Descriptors: Age Discrimination, Compliance (Legal), Court Litigation, Equal Opportunities (Jobs)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Barnes, Margaret V.; Schlottman, Brent A. – Journal of College and University Law, 1982
The 1978 amendments of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act tenure exemptions are discussed. The question of whether faculty members now serving in nontenured capacities can be dismissed on the basis of age is examined. A rebuttal to an article by Stuart H. Bompey is included. (MLW)
Descriptors: Age Discrimination, College Faculty, Court Litigation, Equal Opportunities (Jobs)
Morrison, Malcolm H. – 1982
The Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA) prohibits discrimination against persons aged 40 to 65; the ADEA Amendments of 1978 restrict mandatory retirement. Age 65 has been widely regarded as a customary age for retirement, given widespread eligibility for retirement benefits at that age. Substantial numbers of older workers leave…
Descriptors: Age Discrimination, Aging (Individuals), Equal Opportunities (Jobs), Federal Legislation
Snyder, Robert A.; Brandon, Billie – Personnel Administrator, 1983
An increase in Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) claims prompted a review of the 99 ADEA cases reported by the federal courts in a 15-month period. Administrators are offered 10 recommendations, 9 of which are specifically relevant to ADEA. (Author/MLF)
Descriptors: Age Discrimination, Compliance (Legal), Court Litigation, Dismissal (Personnel)
Lindsey, Michael; And Others – 1979
One of the primary concerns of many of the opponents of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) Amendments of 1978 was the possible adverse effects of the legislation on other labor force subgroups. Although groups such as the NAACP, the Urban League, and the National Organization for Women did not testify directly in opposition to the…
Descriptors: Age, Discriminatory Legislation, Employer Attitudes, Employers
Essex, Nathan L. – American School Board Journal, 2000
Under federal statutes, many employment practices are legally questionable: targeting certain positions for one sex only; using racial quotas to reach diversity goals; using non-job-related tests as pre-employment screening devices; employing discriminatory employment policies; using non-job-related disabilities to deny employment; and inquiring…
Descriptors: Age Discrimination, Court Litigation, Dismissal (Personnel), Elementary Secondary Education