NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 5 results Save | Export
Menacker, Julius – Phi Delta Kappan, 1981
Discusses some Supreme Court rulings that affect the rights of students and teachers. Includes discussion of the balancing test, due process, and equal protection. Offers five principles to guide administrators in interpretating the legal ramifications of school policy. (Author/WD)
Descriptors: Administrator Responsibility, Court Litigation, Due Process, Elementary Secondary Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Menacker, Julius; Morris, Van Cleve – Educational Forum, 1985
The authors examine three major court cases to illustrate a lack of judicial restraint in handling the essentially educational issue of intelligence testing. The authors trace the impact of these three decisions on the shaping of educational policy. The cases are Hobson v. Hansen (1967); Larry P. v. Riles (1979); and PASE v. Hannon (1980). (CT)
Descriptors: Black Students, Civil Rights, Civil Rights Legislation, Court Litigation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Menacker, Julius – West's Education Law Reporter, 1991
In "Fumarolo v. Chicago Board of Education," the Illinois Supreme Court invalidated the Chicago School Reform Act because it violated the one-person, one-vote principle when several school administrators were summarily deprived of tenure by parent-dominated school councils. However, due process concerns for the deposed administrators…
Descriptors: Administrators, Court Litigation, Dismissal (Personnel), Due Process
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Menacker, Julius – Update on Law-Related Education, 1998
Describes a lesson for secondary students where they identify the most positive and negative features of current law governing the status of minors and the relationship of adults to children. Provides a sample of court cases and a list of issues affecting teen-age rights and protections. (CMK)
Descriptors: Adolescents, Childrens Rights, Civil Liberties, Court Litigation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Menacker, Julius – West's Education Law Reporter, 1989
Research shows that failure in adequate school performance is the rule for the poor. Courts should recognize the inequalities in educational opportunity caused by family income inequality and declare that the failure of public schools to respond to this inequality constitutes a violation of the equal protection clause. (MLF)
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Court Litigation, Educational Attainment, Educational Finance