Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Author
Eignor, Daniel R. | 12 |
Cook, Linda L. | 4 |
Stocking, Martha L. | 2 |
Dorans, Neil J. | 1 |
Moses, Tim P. | 1 |
Publication Type
Reports - Research | 6 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 4 |
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Descriptive | 3 |
Reports - Evaluative | 3 |
Guides - Non-Classroom | 1 |
Numerical/Quantitative Data | 1 |
Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Researchers | 2 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
SAT (College Admission Test) | 5 |
College Board Achievement… | 1 |
Graduate Record Examinations | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Dorans, Neil J.; Moses, Tim P.; Eignor, Daniel R. – Educational Testing Service, 2010
Score equating is essential for any testing program that continually produces new editions of a test and for which the expectation is that scores from these editions have the same meaning over time. Particularly in testing programs that help make high-stakes decisions, it is extremely important that test equating be done carefully and accurately.…
Descriptors: Equated Scores, Methods, Data Collection, Data Processing
Eignor, Daniel R. – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2008
This article discusses a particular type of concordance table and the potential for test score misuse that may result from employing such a table. The concordance that is discussed is typically created between scores on different, nonequatable versions of a test that share the same or close to the same test title. These concordance tables often…
Descriptors: Scores, Tables (Data), Comparative Analysis, Equated Scores
Cook, Linda L.; Eignor, Daniel R. – 1981
The purposes of this paper are five-fold to discuss: (1) when item response theory (IRT) equating methods should provide better results than traditional methods; (2) which IRT model, the three-parameter logistic or the one-parameter logistic (Rasch), is the most reasonable to use; (3) what unique contributions IRT methods can offer the equating…
Descriptors: Equated Scores, Latent Trait Theory, Mathematical Models, Test Construction

Eignor, Daniel R.; And Others – Applied Measurement in Education, 1990
Two independent replications of a sequence of simulations were conducted to aid in the diagnosis and interpretation of equating differences found between representative (random) and matched (nonrandom) samples for three commonly used conventional observed-score equating procedures and one item-response-theory-based equating procedure. (SLD)
Descriptors: Equated Scores, Item Response Theory, Sampling, Simulation
Eignor, Daniel R.; And Others – 1995
Two recent simulation studies were conducted to aid in the diagnosis and interpretation of equating differences found between random and matched (nonrandom) samples for four commonly used equating procedures: (1) Tucker; (2) Levine equally reliable; (3) Chained equipercentile observed-score; and (4) three-parameter, item response theory true-score…
Descriptors: Criteria, Equated Scores, Item Response Theory, Raw Scores
Eignor, Daniel R.; Cook, Linda L. – 1983
The purpose of this study was to determine the extent to which item parameters estimated on pretest data from the verbal section of the Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT) can be used for equating purposes in a situation where intact final form SAT testing data have normally been used. Items appearing in two final SAT-verbal forms were calibrated…
Descriptors: Aptitude Tests, College Entrance Examinations, Equated Scores, Feasibility Studies
Cook, Linda L.; Eignor, Daniel R. – 1983
The purpose of this study was to examine the feasibility of using item response theory (IRT) methods to equate different forms of three College Board Achievement Tests (Biology, American History and Social Studies, and Mathematics Level II) and one Graduate Record Examinations Achievement Test (Advanced Biology), rather than conventional or…
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, College Entrance Examinations, Comparative Analysis, Equated Scores
Eignor, Daniel R. – 1993
Procedures used to establish the comparability of scores derived from the College Board Admissions Testing Program (ATP) computer adaptive Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT) prototype and the paper-and-pencil SAT are described in this report. Both the prototype, which is made up of Verbal and Mathematics computer adaptive tests (CATs), and a form of…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, College Entrance Examinations, Comparative Analysis, Computer Assisted Testing

Cook, Linda L.; Eignor, Daniel R. – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 1991
This paper provides the basis for understanding score equating through item response theory (IRT). Theoretical justifications and practical advantages of IRT true-score test procedures are discussed. Three steps in the equating process are specified, and a self-test is included. (SLD)
Descriptors: Equated Scores, Equations (Mathematics), Item Response Theory, Mathematical Models
Stocking, Martha L.; Eignor, Daniel R. – 1986
In item response theory (IRT), preequating depends upon item parameter estimate invariance. Three separate simulations, all using the unidimensional three-parameter logistic item response model, were conducted to study the impact of the following variables on preequating: (1) mean differences in ability; (2) multidimensionality in the data; and…
Descriptors: College Entrance Examinations, Computer Simulation, Equated Scores, Error of Measurement
Eignor, Daniel R.; Stocking, Martha L. – 1986
A previous study of pre-equating the Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT) using item response theory provided unacceptable equating results for SAT-mathematical data. The purpose of this study was to investigate two possible explanations for these unacceptable pre-equating results. Specifically, the calibration process, which made use of the…
Descriptors: College Entrance Examinations, Equated Scores, Higher Education, Latent Trait Theory
Eignor, Daniel R. – 1985
The feasibility of pre-equating, or establishing conversions from raw to scaled scores through the use of pretest data before operationally administering a test, was investigated for the Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT). Item-response theory based equating methods were used to estimate item parameters on SAT pretest data, instead of using final form…
Descriptors: College Entrance Examinations, Equated Scores, Estimation (Mathematics), Feasibility Studies