Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 2 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 10 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 26 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 60 |
Descriptor
Difficulty Level | 119 |
Equated Scores | 119 |
Test Items | 85 |
Item Response Theory | 38 |
Comparative Analysis | 30 |
Statistical Analysis | 24 |
Test Format | 21 |
Item Analysis | 19 |
Simulation | 19 |
Test Construction | 19 |
Achievement Tests | 17 |
More ▼ |
Source
Author
Sinharay, Sandip | 7 |
Holland, Paul | 4 |
Curley, Edward | 3 |
Dorans, Neil J. | 3 |
Feigenbaum, Miriam | 3 |
Holland, Paul W. | 3 |
Kim, Sooyeon | 3 |
Liu, Jinghua | 3 |
Yen, Wendy M. | 3 |
Beard, Jacob G. | 2 |
Dimitrov, Dimiter M. | 2 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Education Level
Secondary Education | 8 |
Elementary Secondary Education | 7 |
Elementary Education | 5 |
Grade 8 | 3 |
High Schools | 3 |
Junior High Schools | 3 |
Middle Schools | 3 |
Grade 4 | 2 |
Grade 6 | 2 |
Higher Education | 2 |
Postsecondary Education | 2 |
More ▼ |
Audience
Researchers | 7 |
Location
Australia | 1 |
Florida | 1 |
Georgia | 1 |
Indonesia | 1 |
Japan | 1 |
Michigan | 1 |
Netherlands | 1 |
Nigeria | 1 |
Saudi Arabia | 1 |
Turkey | 1 |
United Kingdom | 1 |
More ▼ |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Elementary and Secondary… | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Ting Sun; Stella Yun Kim – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2024
Equating is a statistical procedure used to adjust for the difference in form difficulty such that scores on those forms can be used and interpreted comparably. In practice, however, equating methods are often implemented without considering the extent to which two forms differ in difficulty. The study aims to examine the effect of the magnitude…
Descriptors: Difficulty Level, Data Interpretation, Equated Scores, High School Students
Fellinghauer, Carolina; Debelak, Rudolf; Strobl, Carolin – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2023
This simulation study investigated to what extent departures from construct similarity as well as differences in the difficulty and targeting of scales impact the score transformation when scales are equated by means of concurrent calibration using the partial credit model with a common person design. Practical implications of the simulation…
Descriptors: True Scores, Equated Scores, Test Items, Sample Size
Semih Asiret; Seçil Ömür Sünbül – International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies, 2023
In this study, it was aimed to examine the effect of missing data in different patterns and sizes on test equating methods under the NEAT design for different factors. For this purpose, as part of this study, factors such as sample size, average difficulty level difference between the test forms, difference between the ability distribution,…
Descriptors: Research Problems, Data, Test Items, Equated Scores
Dimitrov, Dimiter M.; Atanasov, Dimitar V. – Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2021
This study offers an approach to test equating under the latent D-scoring method (DSM-L) using the nonequivalent groups with anchor tests (NEAT) design. The accuracy of the test equating was examined via a simulation study under a 3 × 3 design by two conditions: group ability at three levels and test difficulty at three levels. The results for…
Descriptors: Equated Scores, Scoring, Test Items, Accuracy
Inga Laukaityte; Marie Wiberg – Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 2024
The overall aim was to examine effects of differences in group ability and features of the anchor test form on equating bias and the standard error of equating (SEE) using both real and simulated data. Chained kernel equating, Postratification kernel equating, and Circle-arc equating were studied. A college admissions test with four different…
Descriptors: Ability Grouping, Test Items, College Entrance Examinations, High Stakes Tests
Akin-Arikan, Çigdem; Gelbal, Selahattin – Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 2021
Purpose: This study aims to compare the performances of Item Response Theory (IRT) equating and kernel equating (KE) methods based on equating errors (RMSD) and standard error of equating (SEE) using the anchor item nonequivalent groups design. Method: Within this scope, a set of conditions, including ability distribution, type of anchor items…
Descriptors: Equated Scores, Item Response Theory, Test Items, Statistical Analysis
Liu, Chunyan; Jurich, Daniel; Morrison, Carol; Grabovsky, Irina – Applied Measurement in Education, 2021
The existence of outliers in the anchor items can be detrimental to the estimation of examinee ability and undermine the validity of score interpretation across forms. However, in practice, anchor item performance can become distorted due to various reasons. This study compares the performance of modified "INFIT" and "OUTFIT"…
Descriptors: Equated Scores, Test Items, Item Response Theory, Difficulty Level
Koçak, Duygu – International Journal of Progressive Education, 2020
The aim of this study was to determine the effect of chance success on test equalization. For this purpose, artificially generated 500 and 1000 sample size data sets were synchronized using linear equalization and equal percentage equalization methods. In the data which were produced as a simulative, a total of four cases were created with no…
Descriptors: Test Theory, Equated Scores, Error of Measurement, Sample Size
Bjermo, Jonas; Miller, Frank – Applied Measurement in Education, 2021
In recent years, the interest in measuring growth in student ability in various subjects between different grades in school has increased. Therefore, good precision in the estimated growth is of importance. This paper aims to compare estimation methods and test designs when it comes to precision and bias of the estimated growth of mean ability…
Descriptors: Scaling, Ability, Computation, Test Items
Huggins-Manley, Anne Corinne; Qiu, Yuxi; Penfield, Randall D. – International Journal of Testing, 2018
Score equity assessment (SEA) refers to an examination of population invariance of equating across two or more subpopulations of test examinees. Previous SEA studies have shown that score equity may be present for examinees scoring at particular test score ranges but absent for examinees scoring at other score ranges. No studies to date have…
Descriptors: Equated Scores, Test Bias, Test Items, Difficulty Level
Musa Adekunle Ayanwale – Discover Education, 2023
Examination scores obtained by students from the West African Examinations Council (WAEC), and National Business and Technical Examinations Board (NABTEB) may not be directly comparable due to differences in examination administration, item characteristics of the subject in question, and student abilities. For more accurate comparisons, scores…
Descriptors: Equated Scores, Mathematics Tests, Test Items, Test Format
Lim, Euijin; Lee, Won-Chan – Applied Measurement in Education, 2020
The purpose of this study is to address the necessity of subscore equating and to evaluate the performance of various equating methods for subtests. Assuming the random groups design and number-correct scoring, this paper analyzed real data and simulated data with four study factors including test dimensionality, subtest length, form difference in…
Descriptors: Equated Scores, Test Length, Test Format, Difficulty Level
Benton, Tom; Leech, Tony; Hughes, Sarah – Cambridge Assessment, 2020
In the context of examinations, the phrase "maintaining standards" usually refers to any activity designed to ensure that it is no easier (or harder) to achieve a given grade in one year than in another. Specifically, it tends to mean activities associated with setting examination grade boundaries. Benton et al (2020) describes a method…
Descriptors: Mathematics Tests, Equated Scores, Comparative Analysis, Difficulty Level
Setiawan, Risky – European Journal of Educational Research, 2019
The purposes of this research are: 1) to compare two equalizing tests conducted with Hebara and Stocking Lord method; 2) to describe the characteristics of each equalizing test method using windows' IRTEQ program. This research employs a participatory approach as the data are collected through questionnaires based on the National Examination…
Descriptors: Equated Scores, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Criteria, Test Items
Bramley, Tom – Research Matters, 2020
The aim of this study was to compare, by simulation, the accuracy of mapping a cut-score from one test to another by expert judgement (using the Angoff method) versus the accuracy with a small-sample equating method (chained linear equating). As expected, the standard-setting method resulted in more accurate equating when we assumed a higher level…
Descriptors: Cutting Scores, Standard Setting (Scoring), Equated Scores, Accuracy