NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Publication Date
In 20250
Since 20240
Since 2021 (last 5 years)0
Since 2016 (last 10 years)0
Since 2006 (last 20 years)1
Education Level
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Education for All Handicapped…1
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 59 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Plyler, Patrick N.; Lowery, Kristy J.; Hamby, Hilary M.; Trine, Timothy D. – Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 2007
Purpose: The effects of multichannel expansion on the objective and subjective evaluation of 20 listeners fitted binaurally with 4-channel, digital in-the-ear hearing instruments were investigated. Method: Objective evaluations were conducted in quiet using the Connected Speech Test (CST) and in noise using the Hearing in Noise Test (HINT) at 40,…
Descriptors: Speech Tests, Auditory Perception, Acoustics, Hearing Impairments
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Potts, Paula L.; Greenwood, Jacalyn – Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 1983
The effectiveness of routine daily hearing and monitoring of 44 students' aids was evaluated using detailed visual-auditory inspection and electroacoustic analysis. Results indicated the need for such changes as a periodic electroacoustic analysis of all hearing aids. Followup revealed a significant decrease in incidence of hearing aid…
Descriptors: Equipment Evaluation, Hearing Aids, Hearing Impairments
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Gorga, Michael P.; And Others – Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1987
Input-output (I/O) functions of hearing aids were measured in response to a 2000 Hz tone burst, having 0.5 ms rise/fall time and 10 ms duration. Findings indicated that the steady-state output limitation characteristics of hearing aids cannot be estimated from their onset responses. (Author/DB)
Descriptors: Audiology, Equipment Evaluation, Hearing Aids, Hearing Impairments
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Walden, Brian E.; And Others – Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 1983
Fifty-five adults with sensorineural hearing impairments participated in the study which indicated nonsignificant interaid performance differences among electroacoustically homogeneous aids. Among other conclusions were that the comparative hearing aid evaluation will not be a good predictor of success in daily communication unless relatively…
Descriptors: Adults, Equipment Evaluation, Hearing Aids, Hearing Impairments
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Weatherton, M. A.; Ferguson, Anna G. – Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1974
Descriptors: Audiology, Equipment Evaluation, Exceptional Child Research, Hearing Impairments
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Witter, H. L.; Goldstein, D. P. – Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1971
Investigation of the effects of frequency range, harmonic distortion, intermodulation distortion, and transient response of hearing aids upon judgments of quality showed transient response measurements the best predictor of listener judgments, with voice a possible factor. (Author/KW)
Descriptors: Audio Equipment, Equipment Evaluation, Hearing Aids, Hearing Impairments
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Sung, Richard J.; Hodgson, William R. – Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1971
Descriptors: Audio Equipment, Equipment Evaluation, Hearing Aids, Hearing Impairments
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Vernon, Jack; And Others – Volta Review, 1972
An implantable type hearing aid was tested to determine its ability to produce cochlear potentials in guinea pigs. (Author)
Descriptors: Equipment Evaluation, Hearing Aids, Hearing Impairments, Research Projects
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Gengel, Roy W.; And Others – Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 1971
Descriptors: Equipment Evaluation, Exceptional Child Services, Hearing Aids, Hearing Impairments
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Van Tasell, Dianne J.; Yanz, Jerry L. – Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1987
Speech recognition threshold (SRT) was measured in quiet and in noise for normal hearing subjects and subjects with high frequency sensorineural hearing loss. The speed, reliability, and apparent sensitivity of the SRT to frequency response characteristics make it a potentially useful tool for hearing aid evaluation. (Author/DB)
Descriptors: Adults, Equipment Evaluation, Hearing Aids, Hearing Impairments
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Aufricht, Hedda – Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 1972
Descriptors: Equipment Evaluation, Followup Studies, Hearing Aids, Hearing Impairments
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Lotterman, Stephen H.; Kasten, Roger N. – Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1971
Speech intelligibility scores obtained with unilaterally hearing impaired subjects under aided and unaided experimental listening conditions suggest that, while the CROS (Contralateral Routing of Signals) hearing aid enhances intelligibility under favorable use conditions, it degrades speech intelligibility in some demanding situations. (Author/KW)
Descriptors: Audio Equipment, Equipment Evaluation, Hearing Aids, Hearing Impairments
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Gardner, Harvey J. – Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 1971
Descriptors: Auditory Perception, Auditory Tests, Equipment Evaluation, Hearing Impairments
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Erickson, Faye N.; Van Tasell, Dianne J. – Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1991
Three hearing aid manufacturers provided custom full-shell in-the-ear hearing aids designed for maximum acoustic gain for each of three hearing-impaired adults. Full-on coupler gain curves were similar across all nine hearing aids, with individual differences producing substantial variance in insertion gain across hearing aids. (Author/DB)
Descriptors: Adults, Audiology, Equipment Evaluation, Hearing Aids
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Sung, Richard J.; And Others – Volta Review, 1973
Descriptors: Audio Equipment, Equipment Evaluation, Exceptional Child Services, Hearing Aids
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4