NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 5 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Ambridge, Ben; Pine, Julian M.; Rowland, Caroline F.; Chang, Franklin – Language, 2012
Children (aged five-to-six and nine-to-ten years) and adults rated the acceptability of well-formed sentences and argument-structure overgeneralization errors involving the prepositional-object and double-object dative constructions (e.g. "Marge pulled the box to Homer/*Marge pulled Homer the box"). In support of the entrenchment hypothesis, a…
Descriptors: Evidence, Sentence Structure, Semantics, Verbs
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Rowland, Caroline F.; Theakston, Anna L. – Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 2009
Purpose: The study of auxiliary acquisition is central to work on language development and has attracted theoretical work from both nativist and constructivist approaches. This study is part of a 2-part companion set that represents a unique attempt to trace the development of auxiliary syntax by using a longitudinal elicitation methodology. The…
Descriptors: Constructivism (Learning), Speech Communication, Sentence Structure, Language Acquisition
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Rowland, Caroline F.; Pine, Julian M. – Journal of Child Language, 2000
Analyzed correct wh-question production and subject-auxiliary inversion errors in one child's wh-question data. Argues that two current movement rule accounts cannot explain patterning of early wh-questions. Data can be explained by the child's knowledge of particular lexically-specific wh-word+auxiliary combinations, and inversion and universion…
Descriptors: Child Language, Error Analysis (Language), Grammar, Language Acquisition
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Rowland, Caroline F.; Pine, Julian M.; Lieven, Elena V.M.; Theaksto, Anna L. – Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 2005
Many current generativist theorists suggest that young children possess the grammatical principles of inversion required for question formation but make errors because they find it difficult to learn language-specific rules about how inversion applies. The present study analyzed longitudinal spontaneous sampled data from twelve 2-3-year-old…
Descriptors: Young Children, Constructivism (Learning), Error Analysis (Language), Language Research
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Ambridge, Ben; Rowland, Caroline F.; Theakston, Anna L.; Tomasello, Michael – Journal of Child Language, 2006
This study investigated different accounts of children's acquisition of non-subject wh-questions. Questions using each of 4 wh-words ("what," "who," "how" and "why"), and 3 auxiliaries (BE, DO and CAN) in 3sg and 3pl form were elicited from 28 children aged 3;6-4;6. Rates of non-inversion error ("Who…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Language Acquisition, Error Analysis (Language), Child Language