Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
| Error Correction | 3 |
| Error Patterns | 3 |
| Probability | 3 |
| College Students | 1 |
| Discussion (Teaching… | 1 |
| Equipment | 1 |
| Feedback (Response) | 1 |
| Foreign Countries | 1 |
| Gender Differences | 1 |
| Groups | 1 |
| Instructional Effectiveness | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Bronkema, Ryan | 1 |
| Gallitto, Elena | 1 |
| Giuliodori, Mauricio J. | 1 |
| Leth-Steensen, Craig | 1 |
| Relling, Alejandro E. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Argentina | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkBronkema, Ryan – College Teaching, 2018
As educators, we've all probably experienced presenting in new places and/or audiences, and having some sort of mishap. Therefore, as part of their professional preparation, we should prepare our students with realistic presentation practice, mishaps and all! Within this paper, I will outline a pedagogical tool that randomizes potential…
Descriptors: Public Speaking, Student Projects, Skill Development, Teaching Methods
Leth-Steensen, Craig; Gallitto, Elena – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2016
A large number of approaches have been proposed for estimating and testing the significance of indirect effects in mediation models. In this study, four sets of Monte Carlo simulations involving full latent variable structural equation models were run in order to contrast the effectiveness of the currently popular bias-corrected bootstrapping…
Descriptors: Mediation Theory, Structural Equation Models, Monte Carlo Methods, Simulation
Relling, Alejandro E.; Giuliodori, Mauricio J. – Advances in Physiology Education, 2015
The aims of the present study were to measure the effects of individual answer (correct vs. incorrect), individual answer of group members (no vs. some vs. all correct), self-confidence about the responses (low vs. mid vs. high), sex (female vs. male students), and group size (2-4 students) on the odds for change and for correctness after peer…
Descriptors: Physiology, Self Esteem, Responses, Gender Differences
