NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing 1 to 15 of 19 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Timothy R. Konold; Elizabeth A. Sanders; Kelvin Afolabi – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2025
Measurement invariance (MI) is an essential part of validity evidence concerned with ensuring that tests function similarly across groups, contexts, and time. Most evaluations of MI involve multigroup confirmatory factor analyses (MGCFA) that assume simple structure. However, recent research has shown that constraining non-target indicators to…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Error of Measurement, Validity, Monte Carlo Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Shunji Wang; Katerina M. Marcoulides; Jiashan Tang; Ke-Hai Yuan – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2024
A necessary step in applying bi-factor models is to evaluate the need for domain factors with a general factor in place. The conventional null hypothesis testing (NHT) was commonly used for such a purpose. However, the conventional NHT meets challenges when the domain loadings are weak or the sample size is insufficient. This article proposes…
Descriptors: Hypothesis Testing, Error of Measurement, Comparative Analysis, Monte Carlo Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Phillip K. Wood – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2024
The logistic and confined exponential curves are frequently used in studies of growth and learning. These models, which are nonlinear in their parameters, can be estimated using structural equation modeling software. This paper proposes a single combined model, a weighted combination of both models. Mplus, Proc Calis, and lavaan code for the model…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Computation, Computer Software, Weighted Scores
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Bang Quan Zheng; Peter M. Bentler – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2025
This paper aims to advocate for a balanced approach to model fit evaluation in structural equation modeling (SEM). The ongoing debate surrounding chi-square test statistics and fit indices has been characterized by ambiguity and controversy. Despite the acknowledged limitations of relying solely on the chi-square test, its careful application can…
Descriptors: Monte Carlo Methods, Structural Equation Models, Goodness of Fit, Robustness (Statistics)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Yuanfang Liu; Mark H. C. Lai; Ben Kelcey – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2024
Measurement invariance holds when a latent construct is measured in the same way across different levels of background variables (continuous or categorical) while controlling for the true value of that construct. Using Monte Carlo simulation, this paper compares the multiple indicators, multiple causes (MIMIC) model and MIMIC-interaction to a…
Descriptors: Classification, Accuracy, Error of Measurement, Correlation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Smith, Carrie E.; Cribbie, Robert A. – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2013
When structural equation modeling (SEM) analyses are conducted, significance tests for all important model relationships (parameters including factor loadings, covariances, etc.) are typically conducted at a specified nominal Type I error rate ([alpha]). Despite the fact that many significance tests are often conducted in SEM, rarely is…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Error of Measurement, Statistical Analysis, Comparative Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Whittaker, Tiffany A. – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2013
Latent means methods such as multiple-indicator multiple-cause (MIMIC) and structured means modeling (SMM) allow researchers to determine whether or not a significant difference exists between groups' factor means. Strong invariance is typically recommended when interpreting latent mean differences. The extent of the impact of noninvariant…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Error of Measurement, Statistical Analysis, Goodness of Fit
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Voelkle, Manuel C.; Oud, Johan H. L.; von Oertzen, Timo; Lindenberger, Ulman – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2012
This article has 3 objectives that build on each other. First, we demonstrate how to obtain maximum likelihood estimates for dynamic factor models (the direct autoregressive factor score model) with arbitrary "T" and "N" by means of structural equation modeling (SEM) and compare the approach to existing methods. Second, we go beyond standard time…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Maximum Likelihood Statistics, Computation, Factor Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Price, Larry R. – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2012
The aim of this study was to compare the small sample (N = 1, 3, 5, 10, 15) performance of a Bayesian multivariate vector autoregressive (BVAR-SEM) time series model relative to frequentist power and parameter estimation bias. A multivariate autoregressive model was developed based on correlated autoregressive time series vectors of varying…
Descriptors: Sample Size, Time, Bayesian Statistics, Structural Equation Models
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Peugh, James; Fan, Xitao – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2012
Growth mixture modeling (GMM) has become a more popular statistical method for modeling population heterogeneity in longitudinal data, but the performance characteristics of GMM enumeration indexes in correctly identifying heterogeneous growth trajectories are largely unknown. Few empirical studies have addressed this issue. This study considered…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Statistical Analysis, Longitudinal Studies, Evaluation Research
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Murphy, Daniel L.; Beretvas, S. Natasha; Pituch, Keenan A. – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2011
This simulation study examined the performance of the curve-of-factors model (COFM) when autocorrelation and growth processes were present in the first-level factor structure. In addition to the standard curve-of factors growth model, 2 new models were examined: one COFM that included a first-order autoregressive autocorrelation parameter, and a…
Descriptors: Sample Size, Simulation, Factor Structure, Statistical Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Chen, Qi; Kwok, Oi-Man; Luo, Wen; Willson, Victor L. – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2010
Growth mixture modeling (GMM) is a relatively new technique for analyzing longitudinal data. However, when applying GMM, researchers might assume that the higher level (nonrepeated measure) units (e.g., students) are independent from each other even though it might not always be true. This article reports the results of a simulation study…
Descriptors: Longitudinal Studies, Data Analysis, Models, Monte Carlo Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Depaoli, Sarah – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2012
Parameter recovery was assessed within mixture confirmatory factor analysis across multiple estimator conditions under different simulated levels of mixture class separation. Mixture class separation was defined in the measurement model (through factor loadings) and the structural model (through factor variances). Maximum likelihood (ML) via the…
Descriptors: Markov Processes, Factor Analysis, Statistical Bias, Evaluation Research
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Leite, Walter L.; Zuo, Youzhen – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2011
Among the many methods currently available for estimating latent variable interactions, the unconstrained approach is attractive to applied researchers because of its relatively easy implementation with any structural equation modeling (SEM) software. Using a Monte Carlo simulation study, we extended and evaluated the unconstrained approach to…
Descriptors: Monte Carlo Methods, Structural Equation Models, Evaluation, Researchers
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Leite, Walter L.; Sandbach, Robert; Jin, Rong; MacInnes, Jann W.; Jackman, M. Grace-Anne – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2012
Because random assignment is not possible in observational studies, estimates of treatment effects might be biased due to selection on observable and unobservable variables. To strengthen causal inference in longitudinal observational studies of multiple treatments, we present 4 latent growth models for propensity score matched groups, and…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Probability, Computation, Observation
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2