NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 9 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Zeng, Lingjia; And Others – Applied Psychological Measurement, 1994
A general delta method is described for computing the standard error (SE) of a chain of linear equations. The general delta method derives the SEs directly from the moments of the score distributions obtained in the equating chain. Computer simulations demonstrate the method. (SLD)
Descriptors: Computer Simulation, Equated Scores, Error of Measurement, Statistical Distributions
Hedges, Larry V.; Vevea, Jack L. – 2003
A computer simulation study was conducted to investigate the amount of uncertainty added to National Assessment of Educational Progress estimates by equating error under three different equating methods and while varying a number of factors that might affect accuracy of equating. Data from past NAEP administrations were used to guide the…
Descriptors: Computer Simulation, Equated Scores, Error of Measurement, Item Response Theory
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Zeng, Lingjia – Applied Psychological Measurement, 1993
A numerical approach for computing standard errors (SEs) of a linear equating is described in which first partial derivatives of equating functions needed to compute SEs are derived numerically. Numerical and analytical approaches are compared using the Tucker equating method. SEs derived numerically are found indistinguishable from SEs derived…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Computer Simulation, Equated Scores, Equations (Mathematics)
Morrison, Carol A.; Fitzpatrick, Steven J. – 1992
An attempt was made to determine which item response theory (IRT) equating method results in the least amount of equating error or "scale drift" when equating scores across one or more test forms. An internal anchor test design was employed with five different test forms, each consisting of 30 items, 10 in common with the base test and 5…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Computer Simulation, Equated Scores, Error of Measurement
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Jarjoura, David; Kolen, Michael J. – Journal of Educational Statistics, 1985
An equating design in which two groups of examinees from slightly different populations are administered a different test form with a subset of common items is widely used. This paper presents standard errors and a simulation that verifies the equation for large samples for an equipercentile equating procedure for this design. (Author/BS)
Descriptors: Computer Simulation, Equated Scores, Error of Measurement, Estimation (Mathematics)
Skaggs, Gary; Lissitz, Robert W. – 1985
This study examined how four commonly used test equating procedures (linear, equipercentile, Rasch Model, and three-parameter) would respond to situations in which the properties or the two tests being equated were different. Data for two tests plus an external anchor test were generated from a three parameter model in which mean test differences…
Descriptors: Computer Simulation, Equated Scores, Error of Measurement, Goodness of Fit
Zeng, Lingjia – 1991
Large sample standard errors of linear equating for the single-group design are derived without making the normality assumption. Two general methods based on the delta method of M. Kendall and A. Stuart (1977) are described. One method uses the exact partial derivatives, and the other uses numerical derivatives. Simulation using the beta-binomial…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Computer Simulation, Equated Scores, Equations (Mathematics)
Stocking, Martha L.; Eignor, Daniel R. – 1986
In item response theory (IRT), preequating depends upon item parameter estimate invariance. Three separate simulations, all using the unidimensional three-parameter logistic item response model, were conducted to study the impact of the following variables on preequating: (1) mean differences in ability; (2) multidimensionality in the data; and…
Descriptors: College Entrance Examinations, Computer Simulation, Equated Scores, Error of Measurement
Parshall, Cynthia G.; And Others – 1991
A Monte Carlo study was conducted to compare the statistical bias and standard errors of non-equivalent-groups linear test equating in small samples of examinees. One thousand samples of each size (15, 25, 50, and 100) were drawn with replacement from each of five archival data files from elementary school and secondary school teacher subject area…
Descriptors: Computer Simulation, Elementary School Teachers, Elementary Secondary Education, Equated Scores