Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Difficulty Level | 2 |
| Error of Measurement | 2 |
| Raw Scores | 2 |
| Test Items | 2 |
| Bias | 1 |
| College Entrance Examinations | 1 |
| Cutting Scores | 1 |
| Equated Scores | 1 |
| Generalizability Theory | 1 |
| Item Response Theory | 1 |
| Scaling | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Arce, Alvaro J. | 1 |
| Curley, Edward | 1 |
| Feigenbaum, Miriam | 1 |
| Holland, Paul W. | 1 |
| Liu, Jinghua | 1 |
| Sinharay, Sandip | 1 |
| Wang, Ze | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
| Grade 3 | 1 |
| Grade 5 | 1 |
| Grade 7 | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| SAT (College Admission Test) | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkArce, Alvaro J.; Wang, Ze – International Journal of Testing, 2012
The traditional approach to scale modified-Angoff cut scores transfers the raw cuts to an existing raw-to-scale score conversion table. Under the traditional approach, cut scores and conversion table raw scores are not only seen as interchangeable but also as originating from a common scaling process. In this article, we propose an alternative…
Descriptors: Generalizability Theory, Item Response Theory, Cutting Scores, Scaling
Download full textLiu, Jinghua; Sinharay, Sandip; Holland, Paul W.; Feigenbaum, Miriam; Curley, Edward – Educational Testing Service, 2009
This study explores the use of a different type of anchor, a "midi anchor", that has a smaller spread of item difficulties than the tests to be equated, and then contrasts its use with the use of a "mini anchor". The impact of different anchors on observed score equating were evaluated and compared with respect to systematic…
Descriptors: Equated Scores, Test Items, Difficulty Level, Error of Measurement
