Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Error of Measurement | 3 |
| Item Sampling | 3 |
| Research Design | 3 |
| Scores | 2 |
| Statistical Analysis | 2 |
| Adults | 1 |
| Analysis of Variance | 1 |
| Cost Effectiveness | 1 |
| Data Collection | 1 |
| Databases | 1 |
| Efficiency | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Cumsille, Patricio E. | 1 |
| Graham, John W. | 1 |
| Misanchuk, Earl R. | 1 |
| Olchowski, Allison E. | 1 |
| Shoemaker, David M. | 1 |
| Taylor, Bonnie J. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| California Psychological… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedShoemaker, David M. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1973
Investigated empirically through post mortem item-examinee samplings were the relative merits of two alternative procedures for allocating items to subtests in multiple matrix sampling and the feasibility of using the jackknife in approximating standard errors of estimate. (Editor)
Descriptors: Databases, Error of Measurement, Item Sampling, Research Design
Direct linkGraham, John W.; Taylor, Bonnie J.; Olchowski, Allison E.; Cumsille, Patricio E. – Psychological Methods, 2006
The authors describe 2 efficiency (planned missing data) designs for measurement: the 3-form design and the 2-method measurement design. The 3-form design, a kind of matrix sampling, allows researchers to leverage limited resources to collect data for 33% more survey questions than can be answered by any 1 respondent. Power tables for estimating…
Descriptors: Cost Effectiveness, Structural Equation Models, Psychological Studies, Data Collection
PDF pending restorationMisanchuk, Earl R. – 1978
Multiple matrix sampling of three subscales of the California Psychological Inventory was used to investigate the effects of four variables on error estimates of the mean (EEM) and variance (EEV). The four variables were examinee population size (600, 450, 300, 150, 100, and 75); number of subtests, (2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7), hence the number of…
Descriptors: Adults, Analysis of Variance, Error of Measurement, Item Sampling
