Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 4 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 5 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 10 |
Descriptor
Error of Measurement | 13 |
Least Squares Statistics | 13 |
Structural Equation Models | 13 |
Goodness of Fit | 6 |
Computation | 5 |
Maximum Likelihood Statistics | 4 |
Regression (Statistics) | 4 |
Simulation | 4 |
Weighted Scores | 4 |
Correlation | 3 |
Evaluation Methods | 3 |
More ▼ |
Source
Grantee Submission | 3 |
Structural Equation Modeling:… | 3 |
Educational and Psychological… | 2 |
Applied Psychological… | 1 |
Journal of Experimental… | 1 |
New Directions for… | 1 |
Structural Equation Modeling | 1 |
Author
Ke-Hai Yuan | 2 |
Auerswald, Max | 1 |
Culpepper, Steven Andrew | 1 |
Deng, Lifang | 1 |
Jiashan Tang | 1 |
Jobst, Lisa J. | 1 |
Joreskog, Karl G. | 1 |
Lei, Ming | 1 |
Lomax, Richard G. | 1 |
Lu, Irene R. R. | 1 |
Luo, Hao | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 10 |
Reports - Research | 6 |
Reports - Evaluative | 5 |
Reports - Descriptive | 2 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Adult Education | 1 |
Audience
Researchers | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Ke-Hai Yuan; Yongfei Fang – Grantee Submission, 2023
Observational data typically contain measurement errors. Covariance-based structural equation modelling (CB-SEM) is capable of modelling measurement errors and yields consistent parameter estimates. In contrast, methods of regression analysis using weighted composites as well as a partial least squares approach to SEM facilitate the prediction and…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Regression (Statistics), Weighted Scores, Comparative Analysis
Ke-Hai Yuan; Yong Wen; Jiashan Tang – Grantee Submission, 2022
Structural equation modeling (SEM) and path analysis using composite-scores are distinct classes of methods for modeling the relationship of theoretical constructs. The two classes of methods are integrated in the partial-least-squares approach to structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM), which systematically generates weighted composites and uses…
Descriptors: Statistical Analysis, Weighted Scores, Least Squares Statistics, Structural Equation Models
Deng, Lifang; Yuan, Ke-Hai – Grantee Submission, 2022
Structural equation modeling (SEM) has been deemed as a proper method when variables contain measurement errors. In contrast, path analysis with composite-scores is preferred for prediction and diagnosis of individuals. While path analysis with composite-scores has been criticized for yielding biased parameter estimates, recent literature pointed…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Path Analysis, Weighted Scores, Error of Measurement
Jobst, Lisa J.; Auerswald, Max; Moshagen, Morten – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2022
Prior studies investigating the effects of non-normality in structural equation modeling typically induced non-normality in the indicator variables. This procedure neglects the factor analytic structure of the data, which is defined as the sum of latent variables and errors, so it is unclear whether previous results hold if the source of…
Descriptors: Goodness of Fit, Structural Equation Models, Error of Measurement, Factor Analysis
Shi, Dexin; Maydeu-Olivares, Alberto – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2020
We examined the effect of estimation methods, maximum likelihood (ML), unweighted least squares (ULS), and diagonally weighted least squares (DWLS), on three population SEM (structural equation modeling) fit indices: the root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA), the comparative fit index (CFI), and the standardized root mean square residual…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Computation, Maximum Likelihood Statistics, Least Squares Statistics
Culpepper, Steven Andrew – Applied Psychological Measurement, 2012
Measurement error significantly biases interaction effects and distorts researchers' inferences regarding interactive hypotheses. This article focuses on the single-indicator case and shows how to accurately estimate group slope differences by disattenuating interaction effects with errors-in-variables (EIV) regression. New analytic findings were…
Descriptors: Evidence, Test Length, Interaction, Regression (Statistics)
Yang-Wallentin, Fan; Joreskog, Karl G.; Luo, Hao – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2010
Ordinal variables are common in many empirical investigations in the social and behavioral sciences. Researchers often apply the maximum likelihood method to fit structural equation models to ordinal data. This assumes that the observed measures have normal distributions, which is not the case when the variables are ordinal. A better approach is…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Factor Analysis, Least Squares Statistics, Computation
Volkwein, J. Fredericks; Yin, Alexander C. – New Directions for Institutional Research, 2010
This chapter summarizes ten selected issues and common problems that arise in most assessment research projects. These include: (1) the uses of grades in assessment; (2) institutional review boards; (3) research design as a compromise; (4) standardized testing; (5) self-reported measures; (6) missing data; (7) weighting data; (8) conditional…
Descriptors: Research Design, Research Methodology, Standardized Tests, Least Squares Statistics
Lu, Irene R. R.; Thomas, D. Roland – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2008
This article considers models involving a single structural equation with latent explanatory and/or latent dependent variables where discrete items are used to measure the latent variables. Our primary focus is the use of scores as proxies for the latent variables and carrying out ordinary least squares (OLS) regression on such scores to estimate…
Descriptors: Least Squares Statistics, Computation, Item Response Theory, Structural Equation Models
Wang, Zhongmiao; Thompson, Bruce – Journal of Experimental Education, 2007
In this study the authors investigated the use of 5 (i.e., Claudy, Ezekiel, Olkin-Pratt, Pratt, and Smith) R[squared] correction formulas with the Pearson r[squared]. The authors estimated adjustment bias and precision under 6 x 3 x 6 conditions (i.e., population [rho] values of 0.0, 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, 0.7, and 0.9; population shapes normal, skewness…
Descriptors: Effect Size, Correlation, Mathematical Formulas, Monte Carlo Methods
Lei, Ming; Lomax, Richard G. – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2005
This simulation study investigated the robustness of structural equation modeling to different degrees of nonnormality under 2 estimation methods, generalized least squares and maximum likelihood, and 4 sample sizes, 100, 250, 500, and 1,000. Each of the slight and severe nonnormality degrees was comprised of pure skewness, pure kurtosis, and both…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Simulation, Sample Size, Least Squares Statistics

McQuitty, Shaun – Structural Equation Modeling, 1997
LISREL 8 invokes a ridge option when maximum likelihood or generalized least squares are used to estimate a structural equation model with a nonpositive definite covariance or correlation matrix. Implications of the ridge option for model fit, parameter estimates, and standard errors are explored through two examples. (SLD)
Descriptors: Error of Measurement, Estimation (Mathematics), Goodness of Fit, Least Squares Statistics
Wang, Lin; And Others – 1995
Research in structured equation modeling (SEM) suggests that nonnormal data will invalidate chi-square tests and produce erroneous standard errors. However, much remains unknown about the extent to which, and the conditions under which nonnormal data can affect SEM application, especially when excessive skewness and kurtosis are present in data.…
Descriptors: Behavior Patterns, Chi Square, Children, Error of Measurement