Publication Date
In 2025 | 6 |
Since 2024 | 37 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 125 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 247 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 394 |
Descriptor
Essays | 399 |
Feedback (Response) | 399 |
Foreign Countries | 211 |
English (Second Language) | 148 |
Second Language Learning | 146 |
Writing Instruction | 145 |
Teaching Methods | 131 |
Writing Evaluation | 130 |
Second Language Instruction | 122 |
Student Attitudes | 103 |
Undergraduate Students | 100 |
More ▼ |
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
Teachers | 8 |
Administrators | 1 |
Location
United Kingdom | 18 |
China | 14 |
Iran | 13 |
Canada | 12 |
Indonesia | 12 |
Netherlands | 12 |
Turkey | 9 |
Hong Kong | 8 |
Taiwan | 8 |
Japan | 7 |
Saudi Arabia | 7 |
More ▼ |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Abbas, Mohsin; van Rosmalen, Peter; Kalz, Marco – IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 2023
For predicting and improving the quality of essays, text analytic metrics (surface, syntactic, morphological, and semantic features) can be used to provide formative feedback to the students in higher education. In this study, the goal was to identify a sufficient number of features that exhibit a fair proxy of the scores given by the human raters…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Automation, Essays, Scoring
Emmanuel Fokides; Eirini Peristeraki – Education and Information Technologies, 2025
This research analyzed the efficacy of ChatGPT as a tool for the correction and provision of feedback on primary school students' short essays written in both the English and Greek languages. The accuracy and qualitative aspects of ChatGPT-generated corrections and feedback were compared to that of educators. For the essays written in English, it…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Error Correction, Feedback (Response), Elementary School Students
Galina Shulgina; Jamie Costley; Irina Shcheglova; Han Zhang; Natalya Sedova – Smart Learning Environments, 2024
While peer-editing is considered an important part of developing students' academic writing, questions remain about how different types of peer-editing affect subsequent student performance. The present study looked at a group of university students (N = 149) engaged in peer editing of one another's essays in an online security studies course. The…
Descriptors: Peer Evaluation, Writing Evaluation, Editing, Feedback (Response)
AL Harrasi, Kothar Talib Sulaiman – Language Testing in Asia, 2023
Drawing upon research on the ways texts work as communication across different disciplines, this study investigated teacher and student feedback practices on three different patterns of writing: comparison-contrast essays, opinion essays, and cause-and-effect essays. The data were collected through three qualitative techniques: interviews, class…
Descriptors: Writing Evaluation, Feedback (Response), Rhetoric, Essays
Tay, Hui Yong; Lam, Karen W. L. – Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 2022
The provision of feedback is widely practised as part of formative assessment. However, studies that examine the impact of feedback are usually from the teachers' perspective, focusing on why and how they provide feedback. Fewer studies examine feedback from the students' perspective, especially in the way they experience, make sense of and take…
Descriptors: Learner Engagement, Feedback (Response), Student Attitudes, Essays
Nishen, Anna K.; Kessels, Ursula – Social Psychology of Education: An International Journal, 2022
When providing feedback, teachers are concerned not only with the simple transmission of information, but also with motivational and interpersonal dynamics. To mitigate these concerns, teachers may inflate feedback by reducing negative or increasing positive content. The resulting difference between initial judgments and feedback may be even more…
Descriptors: Minority Group Students, Migrants, Foreign Countries, Student Evaluation
Seyyed Kazem Banihashem; Nafiseh Taghizadeh Kerman; Omid Noroozi; Jewoong Moon; Hendrik Drachsler – International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 2024
Peer feedback is introduced as an effective learning strategy, especially in large-size classes where teachers face high workloads. However, for complex tasks such as writing an argumentative essay, without support peers may not provide high-quality feedback since it requires a high level of cognitive processing, critical thinking skills, and a…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Peer Evaluation, Artificial Intelligence, Essays
Hrubik, Jessica; Morgan, Denise N. – Middle Grades Research Journal, 2022
Providing timely and helpful writing feedback for student writers, especially those at the middle and high school level, can present an unwieldy challenge for teachers. Yet, feedback is necessary for students' growth as writers. There is an increased interest and use of automatic writing programs to provide students with writing feedback. However,…
Descriptors: Automation, Essays, Scores, Feedback (Response)
Chen, Binbin; Bao, Lina; Zhang, Rui; Zhang, Jingyu; Liu, Feng; Wang, Shuai; Li, Mingjiang – Journal of Educational Computing Research, 2024
Language learning has increasingly benefited from Computer-Assisted Language Learning (CALL) technologies, especially with Artificial Intelligence involved in recent years. CALL in writing learning acknowledged as the core of language learning is being realized by technologies like Automated Writing Evaluation (AWE), and Automated Essay Scoring…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Instruction, English (Second Language), Second Language Learning, Writing Instruction
Wilson, Joshua; Huang, Yue; Palermo, Corey; Beard, Gaysha; MacArthur, Charles A. – International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 2021
This study examined a naturalistic, districtwide implementation of an automated writing evaluation (AWE) software program called "MI Write" in elementary schools. We specifically examined the degree to which aspects of MI Write were implemented, teacher and student attitudes towards MI Write, and whether MI Write usage along with other…
Descriptors: Automation, Writing Evaluation, Feedback (Response), Computer Software
Wilson, Joshua; Huang, Yue; Palermo, Corey; Beard, Gaysha; MacArthur, Charles A. – Grantee Submission, 2021
This study examined a naturalistic, districtwide implementation of an automated writing evaluation (AWE) software program called "MI Write" in elementary schools. We specifically examined the degree to which aspects of MI Write were implemented, teacher and student attitudes towards MI Write, and whether MI Write usage along with other…
Descriptors: Automation, Writing Evaluation, Feedback (Response), Computer Software
Knight, Stephanie K.; Greenberger, Scott W.; McNaughton, Morgan E. – Active Learning in Higher Education, 2021
Students need feedback from instructors to learn from their mistakes and improve their academic skills. Responding to student writing is a central and necessary component of the instructor-student feedback loop. There are many forms of feedback on written assignments, and not all of them have the same role in supporting student learning. For…
Descriptors: Interdisciplinary Approach, Feedback (Response), Written Language, College Students
Alnefaie, Mashael – International Education Studies, 2023
This study explored students' grammatical, mechanical, and lexical errors in EFL writing. Also, it aimed to investigate the effect of instructor feedback throughout the semester on students' types and frequency of errors in two types of essays, including a process essay and an argumentative essay. This study was conducted on 24 EFL students…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Feedback (Response), English (Second Language), Second Language Learning
Panadero, Ernesto; García-Pérez, Daniel; Ruiz, Javier Fernández; Fraile, Juan; Sánchez-Iglesias, Iván; Brown, Gavin T. L. – Educational Psychology, 2023
This study explored the effects of three factors (feedback occasion, type of feedback, and year level) on self-efficacy and emotions when university students self-assessed. 126 higher education students from three different year levels self-assessed their performance on a writing task two times (before and after receiving feedback). Self-efficacy…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Student Attitudes, Self Efficacy, Psychological Patterns
Kai Guo; Xinyu Chen; Shen Qiao – RELC Journal: A Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2024
Although prior studies have suggested the benefits of a collaborative approach to providing peer feedback in EFL writing, little is known about how students engage in collaborative peer feedback (CPF) activities. This paper reports on a case study involving five Chinese EFL students who collaboratively provided feedback on five argumentative…
Descriptors: Peer Evaluation, Feedback (Response), English (Second Language), Second Language Instruction