Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Essays | 3 |
Humanities | 3 |
Writing Assignments | 3 |
College Faculty | 2 |
Thinking Skills | 2 |
Undergraduate Students | 2 |
Writing Skills | 2 |
Accountability | 1 |
Advanced Students | 1 |
Attitude Change | 1 |
Collaborative Writing | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Khandaker, Nobel | 1 |
Nicholas, Mark | 1 |
O'Neill, Kate E. | 1 |
Raider-Roth, Miriam | 1 |
Soh, Leen-Kiat | 1 |
Thomas, William G. | 1 |
Ullyot, Michael | 1 |
Publication Type
Reports - Research | 2 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 2 |
Journal Articles | 1 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 3 |
Postsecondary Education | 2 |
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Ullyot, Michael; O'Neill, Kate E. – Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 2016
This article explores the degree to which student collaborations on research and writing assignments can effectively realize learning outcomes. The assignment, in this case, encouraged students to contribute discrete parts of a research project in order to develop their complementary abilities: researching, consulting, drafting, and revising. The…
Descriptors: Cooperative Learning, Student Research, Research Projects, Writing Assignments
Soh, Leen-Kiat; Khandaker, Nobel; Thomas, William G. – International Association for Development of the Information Society, 2013
The digital environment has had an immense effect on American society, learning, and education: we have more sources available at our fingertips than any previous generation. Teaching and learning with these new sources, however, has been a challenging transition. Students are confronted with an ocean of digital objects and need skills to navigate…
Descriptors: Collaborative Writing, Databases, Teaching Methods, Information Technology
Nicholas, Mark; Raider-Roth, Miriam – Online Submission, 2011
This investigation focused on a group of 17 faculty drawn from disciplines in the humanities social sciences and natural sciences. Using in-depth interviews, focus group discussions and qualitative coding strategies, this study examined how faculty conceptualized the term critical thinking (CT), and how they assessed for it in general education…
Descriptors: General Education, Standardized Tests, Social Sciences, Natural Sciences