Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Educational Administration | 2 |
| Educational Indicators | 2 |
| Educational Legislation | 2 |
| Ethics | 2 |
| Federal Legislation | 2 |
| Federal Programs | 2 |
| Accountability | 1 |
| Achievement Gap | 1 |
| Caring | 1 |
| Criticism | 1 |
| Democracy | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 2 |
| Individuals with Disabilities… | 1 |
| Individuals with Disabilities… | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkStorey, Valerie A.; Beeman, Tom – International Electronic Journal for Leadership in Learning, 2006
New DEEL does not refer to a specific policy or reform, but rather to an ideology, unencumbered by international borders and domestic politics. In this paper, we first endeavor to identify the rhetoric of New DEEL and social justice, and the reality of its implementation in schools today; spending time on the NCLB Act which we postulate is a major…
Descriptors: Social Justice, Instructional Leadership, Ethics, Ideology
Download full textFaircloth, Susan C. – Values and Ethics in Educational Administration, 2004
This article argues that the implementation of the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) creates what Sergiovanni et al. (2004) term "turbulent policy demands" which foster ethical dilemmas for principals. It focuses on the impact of the implementation of NCLB on students with disabilities, as it appears that there is discontinuity between the…
Descriptors: Educational Legislation, Federal Legislation, Disabilities, Equal Education
