NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 3 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Sarven S. McLinton; Sarah N. Menz; Bernard Guerin; Elspeth McInnes – Journal of Academic Ethics, 2024
Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC) reviewers often provide similar feedback across applications, which suggests that the problem lies in researcher awareness of key issues rather than novel, unsolvable challenges. If common problems can be addressed before lodgement by applicants referencing clear evidence-based supports (e.g., FAQs on common…
Descriptors: Ethics, Informed Consent, Research Committees, Research Methodology
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Cascant Sempere, Maria Josep; Aliyu, Talatu; Bollaert, Cathy – Education Sciences, 2022
Contemporary North-South research collaborations are fraught with power relations originating in colonialism. Debates about research ethics have tended to turn around the "procedural ethics" formal model and the "everyday ethics" practical model. We build on that to suggest a second debate that scrutinises ethics and power…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Research, Ethics, International Cooperation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Borrett, Donald S.; Sampson, Heather; Cavoukian, Ann – Research Ethics, 2017
Privacy by Design, a globally accepted framework for personal data management and privacy protection, advances the view that privacy cannot be assured solely by compliance with regulatory frameworks but must become an organisation's default mode of operation. We are proposing a similar template for the research ethics review process. The Research…
Descriptors: Research Design, Ethics, Information Management, Information Security