Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 4 |
Descriptor
Source
Association of Governing… | 6 |
Achieve, Inc. | 2 |
Bureau of Education,… | 1 |
Emergency Librarian | 1 |
OECD Publishing | 1 |
Regional Educational… | 1 |
Author
Publication Type
Guides - Non-Classroom | 14 |
Tests/Questionnaires | 8 |
Reports - Descriptive | 3 |
Guides - Classroom - Teacher | 2 |
Historical Materials | 1 |
Journal Articles | 1 |
Education Level
Elementary Secondary Education | 3 |
Elementary Education | 2 |
Secondary Education | 2 |
Early Childhood Education | 1 |
Audience
Policymakers | 18 |
Practitioners | 10 |
Administrators | 9 |
Parents | 2 |
Teachers | 2 |
Community | 1 |
Researchers | 1 |
Students | 1 |
Location
California (Los Angeles) | 1 |
California (Sacramento) | 1 |
Colorado (Boulder) | 1 |
Connecticut (New Haven) | 1 |
Denmark | 1 |
Estonia | 1 |
Florida | 1 |
Michigan | 1 |
Missouri | 1 |
Netherlands | 1 |
Norway | 1 |
More ▼ |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Gouëdard, Pierre – OECD Publishing, 2021
Across OECD countries, the increasing demand for evidence-based policy making has further led governments to design policies jointly with clear measurable objectives, and to define relevant indicators to monitor their achievement. This paper discusses the importance of such indicators in supporting the implementation of education policies.…
Descriptors: Educational Indicators, Program Implementation, Educational Policy, Policy Formation
Cherasaro, Trudy; Yanoski, David; Swackhamer, Lyn – Regional Educational Laboratory Central, 2015
This guide was developed to provide guidance to states or districts wishing to monitor implementation of educator evaluation systems. It describes a three-step process: develop state guidelines for educator evaluation systems; develop data collection methods; and determine adherence criteria and review data against criteria. The process was…
Descriptors: Teacher Evaluation, Program Implementation, Guidelines, Data Collection
Achieve, Inc., 2014
In joint partnership, Achieve, The Council of Chief State School Officers, and Student Achievement Partners have developed a Toolkit for Evaluating the Alignment of Instructional and Assessment Materials to the Common Core State Standards. The Toolkit is a set of interrelated, freely available instruments for evaluating alignment to the CCSS; each…
Descriptors: State Standards, Alignment (Education), Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods
Achieve, Inc., 2014
In joint partnership, Achieve, The Council of Chief State School Officers, and Student Achievement Partners have developed a Toolkit for Evaluating the Alignment of Instructional and Assessment Materials to the Common Core State Standards (CCSS). The Toolkit is a set of interrelated, freely available instruments for evaluating alignment to the…
Descriptors: State Standards, Alignment (Education), Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods
Halverson, Don E. – 1981
This checklist is intended to give school governing board members a means of assessing their meeting practices. The checklist contains five categories, with a total of 80 questions, pertaining to meeting-management variables common to all governing boards. The categories include: (1) preparation for the meetings; (2) operation of the meetings; (3)…
Descriptors: Boards of Education, Check Lists, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Criteria
Brown, Susan, Ed. – 1984
Designed to assist local board of education members, administrators, teachers, and parents, this guide provides information on planning a comprehensive computer education program and on selecting hardware and software. Planning topics discussed include purposes/types of computer use, staff training, location, distribution of computers across…
Descriptors: Budgets, Check Lists, Computer Software, Educational Planning

Epler, Doris – Emergency Librarian, 1991
Describes evaluation checklists developed by the American Association of School Librarians (AASL) and the Association for Educational Communications and Technology (AECT) for use by school library resource centers. Separate checklists are described for teacher-librarians, school administrators, district and regional library directors, teachers,…
Descriptors: Administrators, Check Lists, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Criteria
Nason, John W.; Axelrod, Nancy R. – Association of Governing Boards of Universities and Colleges, 1980
A practical guide to the process of selecting and appointing new college presidents is presented, based on a literature reivew, questionnaire responses, and institutional case studies. The following nine steps in the process are examined: (1) establishing the machinery of search and selection; (2) organizing the committee; (3) formulating the…
Descriptors: Administrator Selection, Affirmative Action, Check Lists, College Presidents
National Coalition of Advocates for Students, Boston, MA. – 1992
This booklet presents a set of criteria that can be used to evaluate and compare curricula for the teaching of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) and Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV). The criteria are arranged in a checklist covering curriculum content and curriculum development/implementation. The booklet discusses developmental…
Descriptors: Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome, Check Lists, Community Involvement, Curriculum Development
Nason, John W. – Association of Governing Boards of Universities and Colleges, 1984
Guidelines for locating and selecting a college president are presented. The complexities of the job are reviewed, including the changing presidential role, shared governance, and equal opportunity requirements. The first step is to establish a framework for search and selection that covers the nature of the search and selection committee (e.g.,…
Descriptors: Administrator Role, Administrator Selection, Check Lists, College Presidents
Tennessee State Dept. of Education, Nashville. – 1982
Intended for use by teachers, administrators, and boards of education in Tennessee as they make decisions about the instructional and managerial uses of microcomputers in education, this handbook is structured around several main topics: (1) basic microcomputer information, including microcomputer components and peripheral equipment, computer…
Descriptors: Check Lists, Computer Assisted Instruction, Computer Literacy, Computer Managed Instruction
Paltridge, James Gilbert; And Others – Association of Governing Boards of Universities and Colleges, 1983
Criteria for self-study by private college governing boards are presented. For each criterion, questions are presented, along with three response options: "yes,""no," and "do not know or can not judge." A response option for judging the board's overall performance on each criterion is also included. In addition, brief introductory comments for…
Descriptors: Campus Planning, Check Lists, College Planning, College Role
Paltridge, James Gilbert; And Others – Association of Governing Boards of Universities and Colleges, 1982
Criteria for self-study by public college governing boards are presented. For each criterion, questions are presented, along with three response options: "yes,""no," and "do not know or can not judge." A response option for judging the board's overall performance on each criterion is also included. In addition, brief introductory comments for each…
Descriptors: Accountability, Campus Planning, Check Lists, College Planning
Association of Governing Boards of Universities and Colleges, 1982
Criteria for self-study by theological school governing boards are presented. For each criterion, questions are presented, along with three response options: "yes,""no," and "do not know or can not judge." A response option for judging the board's overall performance on each criterion is also included. In addition, brief introductory comments for…
Descriptors: Campus Planning, Check Lists, Church Related Colleges, Church Role
Association of Governing Boards of Universities and Colleges, 1983
Criteria for self-study for governing boards of public multicampus higher education systems are presented. For each criterion, questions are presented, along with three response options: "yes,""no," and "do not know or can not judge." A response option for judging the board's overall performance on each criterion is also included. The criteria are…
Descriptors: Accountability, Campus Planning, Check Lists, College Planning
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1 | 2