NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Elementary and Secondary…45
Education Amendments 19741
Elementary and Secondary…1
No Child Left Behind Act 20011
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 45 results Save | Export
Pittsburgh Public Schools, PA. – 1967
Viewing decision makers within the program as the primary audience for program evaluation information, a model for the evaluation of ESEA Title I projects is developed for program improvement as well as program assessment. The model incorporates four stages of assessment, with five evaluative criteria distinguished for each stage. Both negative…
Descriptors: Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Federal Legislation, Guidelines
Deck, Dennis; Arter, Judy – 1981
This paper presents key concepts and practical suggestions to use in evaluating three types of Title I summer programs. A description of the summer program characteristics is followed by outlines of the three evaluation designs: (1) norm referenced design; (2) criterion referenced design; and (3) comparison group design. The techniques, procedural…
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Measurement
Northwest Regional Educational Lab., Portland, OR. – 1969
The Symposium proceedings point out that the evaluation of educational innovations awaits the modernization of evaluation theory. Specific approaches to the problem are presented in five papers, as follows: (1) "An Overview of the Evaluation Problem," by Egon G. Guba, Associate Dean, School of Education, Indiana University, Bloomington,…
Descriptors: Decision Making, Educational Change, Educational Innovation, Evaluation Criteria
Chalupsky, Albert B.; and others – Urban Rev, 1969
Descriptors: Action Research, Compensatory Education, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods
Caldwell, Michael S. – 1968
Educational programs, regarded as inputs, may be developed within a procedural framework to achieve outputs of desired change and improvement. Eight criteria for assessing plans and strategies are relevance, legality, congruence, legitimacy, compatibility, balance, practicability, and cost/effectiveness. (JK)
Descriptors: Decision Making, Educational Improvement, Educational Planning, Educational Strategies
PDF pending restoration PDF pending restoration
Chuang, Ying C.; Theimer, William C. – 1970
The problem of educational evaluation, the various types of evaluation, and the different kinds of models of evaluation systems are discussed in some detail. The educational needs of the students, staff, community, and the Philadelphia Title I schools, as agreed by members of the evaluation team, are listed. A taxonomy of Title I evaluation is…
Descriptors: Course Evaluation, Disadvantaged Youth, Evaluation, Evaluation Criteria
Gabriel, Roy M. – 1980
Three principal uses of composite variables in the Title I Evaluation and Reporting System (TIERS) are examined in light of four basic methodological issues: (1) the criterion used in constructing the composite; (2) the likely reliability of both component and criterion variables; (3) the form of the relationship between components and criterion;…
Descriptors: Admission Criteria, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods
HARSH, J. RICHARD – 1967
APPRAISALS OF ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY ACT PROGRAMS SHOULD BE MADE IN TERMS OF (1) A PROGRAM'S STATED PURPOSES, (2) A BEHAVIORIAL DEFINITION OF PROGRAM OBJECTIVES, (3) THE SITUATIONS AND EXPERIENCES THROUGH WHICH THE OBJECTIVES ARE TO BE ACHIEVED, (4) DATA COLLECTED BY APPROPRIATE INSTRUMENTS TO MEASURE THE ACHIEVEMENT OF OBJECTIVES, AND (5) DATA…
Descriptors: Compensatory Education, Data Analysis, Data Collection, Disadvantaged Youth
Rost, Paul; And Others – 1972
Albuquerque's Title I evaluation staff is in the process of generating a comprehensive local evaluation design because it considers the federally required product evaluation unsatisfactory. The required mean-gain comparisons were extended beyond the dimension of program to the dimensions of school, grade, and Title I instructor. This evaluation…
Descriptors: Elementary Education, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Needs
Provus, Malcolm M. – 1969
A schema for the evaluation of ESEA Title I and III programs is based upon the view that evaluation should be considered as a process for program development and stabilization. Following a general systems approach and applying management theory, the model includes methods for using evaluation as a program improvement tool, with educational…
Descriptors: Bibliographies, Educational Programs, Educationally Disadvantaged, Evaluation Criteria
Stufflebeam, Daniel L. – 1968
The need for competent formal evaluation programs, particularly for new federally assisted programs, is expressed. Problems in defining educational evaluation and its requirements, in designing such evaluations, and 3 possible sources of faulty conceptual bases for evaluations, are presented. An attempt is made to define evaluation in general, to…
Descriptors: Accountability, Decision Making, Educational Change, Evaluation
House, Ernest R.; Husen, Torsten – 1979
Presented here are reviews of the reports from the National Institute of Education (NIE) on the Compensatory Education Study (an evaluation of compensatory education programs in the United States). Ernest House's article addresses the evaluation study directly. It covers the study's assessment of funding allocations, program administration,…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Compensatory Education, Disadvantaged Youth, Educational Improvement
Educational Testing Service, Princeton, NJ. – 1966
This document contains the abridged proceedings of a workshop on the evaluation of ESEA Title I programs, which are designed to improve education for disadvantaged children. Thirty-nine participants from 24 States attended the workshop. The workshop's 14 papers and four discussion excerpts are organized under four main headings: (1) Title I…
Descriptors: Disadvantaged, Disadvantaged Youth, Educational Experiments, Educational Objectives
Anderson, Janice K.; And Others – 1978
In order to assess the impact of Title I programs, models specifying criteria, techniques and methodologies for evaluation were developed. These models prescribe pre- and post-test results for both Title I and non Title I children. This report describes the status of the use of the models, the experience of people who used them during the 1976-77…
Descriptors: Compensatory Education, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods
Maryland State Dept. of Education, Baltimore. Div. of Compensatory, Urban, and Supplementary Programs. – 1971
This booklet comprises excerpts from the proceedings of a conference held in Maryland to explore the related themes of accountability and the evaluation of compensatory education. Participants at the conference were administrators, teachers, aides, and parents who met in small-group work sessions. The conference is judged to have succeeded in…
Descriptors: Accountability, Compensatory Education, Educational Objectives, Educational Problems
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3