Descriptor
Source
| Clearing House | 64 |
Author
| Watman, Thomas J. | 2 |
| Allen, Michael | 1 |
| Baker, D. Philip | 1 |
| Bender, David R. | 1 |
| Berg, Kenneth A. | 1 |
| Berrie, Phillip J. | 1 |
| Billings, Ronald L. | 1 |
| Boals, Beverly | 1 |
| Bonwell, Charles C. | 1 |
| Bresee, Clyde W. | 1 |
| Broyles, Bill | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 8 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| National Assessment of… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedPorter, James H. – Clearing House, 1972
The author takes a firm stand in favor of performance contracting, viewing it as a means of attaining new levels in job satisfaction and teacher independence (professionally). (AN)
Descriptors: Accountability, Educational Strategies, Evaluation Criteria, Performance Contracts
Peer reviewedWelsh, Catherine A. C.; And Others – Clearing House, 1978
Argues the need for teacher professionalization, specific obstacles impeding it, including the meanings of the term and the rationalizations offered for not seeking it. Offers a strategy for pursuing and achieving the professionalization of teachers. (Author/RK)
Descriptors: Definitions, Evaluation Criteria, Persuasive Discourse, Professional Recognition
Peer reviewedKahn, Michael S. – Clearing House, 1978
Textbooks have more influence than teachers in shaping the curriculum. They set objectives, daily lessons and activities, and influence test questions. Since the text is often the determinant of a course of study, the selection of a text can be a critical task. Consequently, an instrument for measuring the strengths and weaknesses of textbooks is…
Descriptors: Answer Sheets, Evaluation Criteria, Textbook Evaluation, Textbook Selection
Peer reviewedFeatherstone, L.; Romano, Louis – Clearing House, 1977
Efforts on the part of administrators and boards of education to develop a rational evaluation procedure, coupled with intelligently conceived criteria to measure performance of administrators, would tend to remove much of the potential trauma that now exists in administrator evaluation. Discusses who should be responsible for the development of…
Descriptors: Administrator Evaluation, Administrator Qualifications, Evaluation Criteria, Guidelines
Peer reviewedIngils, Chester R. – Clearing House, 1970
Evaluation of the attainment of educational objectives and the behavioral development of the learner would be sufficient evaluation of the qualities of the teaching he received. (CK)
Descriptors: Administrators, Educational Objectives, Evaluation Criteria, Item Analysis
Peer reviewedDilworth, Collett B., Jr.; Reising, Robert W. – Clearing House, 1979
Three types of validity are discussed: content, criterion, and construct. It is suggested that those who teach and evaluate student writing should be aware of the need for valid and reliable measures of evaluating and grading student compositions. (KC)
Descriptors: Educational Philosophy, Evaluation Criteria, Grading, Reliability
Peer reviewedRiechard, Donald E. – Clearing House, 1976
After judging and evaluating four science fairs during a two week period, the author moved to put down some thoughts and suggestions. His comments fell into three major categories: 1) purposes of science fairs, 2) types of science fair projects, and 3) judging the projects. (Author/RK)
Descriptors: Educational Objectives, Educational Planning, Evaluation Criteria, Science Fairs
Peer reviewedBroyles, Bill – Clearing House, 1985
Offers guidelines for grading essays so that students and parents can see what is expected. Suggests keying a grading scale to the criteria set forth in the guidelines. (FL)
Descriptors: English Instruction, Essays, Evaluation Criteria, Grading
Peer reviewedMcLane, Mary; and others – Clearing House, 1969
The authors found "team teaching a step forward in seeking objectivity in evaluation. (Author)
Descriptors: Discussion Groups, Evaluation Criteria, Student Attitudes, Student Evaluation
Peer reviewedThompson, Richard A. – Clearing House, 1974
The central purpose of this paper is to call the attention of teachers to propaganda techniques and the criteria for critically evaluating printed matter in the hope that their awareness will lead to implementation of instructional strategies commensurate with the thinking levels of students in their charge. (Author/RK)
Descriptors: Critical Reading, Evaluation Criteria, Learning Experience, Propaganda
Peer reviewedBerg, Kenneth A. – Clearing House, 1977
Compares the relationship between formal preparation for leadership and successful leadership ability, discusses five criteria for leadership, and the responsibilities of educational leaders. (Author/RK)
Descriptors: Administrator Qualifications, Definitions, Evaluation Criteria, Leadership Qualities
Peer reviewedBresee, Clyde W. – Clearing House, 1976
Author states that: "Teachers need to be freed from any compulsion to make distribution charts and comparative judgments of pupil learning for grading purposes." Proficiency of a student in a given task or subject area should be measured without relation to success or failure of other students in the group. (Auth/RW)
Descriptors: Competitive Selection, Educational Objectives, Evaluation Criteria, Grading
Peer reviewedErnest, Bill – Clearing House, 1985
Details a method of evaluating principals, explains why evaluation is important, and discusses who should conduct the evaluation. (FL)
Descriptors: Administrator Evaluation, Administrator Role, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Criteria
Peer reviewedWatman, Thomas J. – Clearing House, 1972
Discusses school supervision systems and methods of implementation. (AN)
Descriptors: Conference Reports, Educational Philosophy, Evaluation Criteria, School Supervision
Peer reviewedEllenberg, F. C. – Clearing House, 1972
The author discusses various characteristics and studies that suggest what a good school is. He also gives various criteria for judging a good school. (MF)
Descriptors: Community Attitudes, Curriculum Evaluation, Education, Educational Policy
